Do theists have a very low standard of evidence?

They don't have any standards of "evidence" at all.

Religious faith is not based on evidence but rather on personal revelation and emotion -- how something feels to the believer. They think the beauty of the universe must be the product of a god because that is how they FEEL about it, not because that beauty actually comprises any objective empirical evidence. They think that you will somehow be convinced by a certain Bible verse because they FEEL its truth, so whether there is any actual, demonstrable truth to it is actually irrelevant. And if they feel it so strongly, they can't understand why someone else doesn't.

It's really pointless to talk about "evidence" in relation to religious belief. The two concepts are antithetical.

Yes, this is evident in their arguments. Just take the recent Nye vs. Ham debate for example. A Bible verse does in no way count as evidence. To say there is a god because the universe is complex and beautiful is a very weak argument to make. The fact that it is "beautiful" is opinion, and most of the "complexity" has been and can be explained by science.

What "Belief" is easier..You came from an exploding rock, or God created the magnificent universe.

Both are "Beliefs", which one sounds logical. Now imagine the 10 most beautiful women in the world, now tell me they were once a lizard that swam out of some pond slime..you atheist actually swallow that stuff and try your damnedest to feed it to christians..keep up the good work, your default god satan loves you for it..I rest my case.

No...its just I would never ever ever be able to convince a non-believer of God using only non-spiritual evidence. Only when a non-believe takes a leap of faith and honestly say I am willing to see the evidence beyond only that which I can touch and measure will the evidence be all around them.

Theists understanding of evidence is part of their hypocrisy; when challenged to produce evidence to support any aspect of their beliefs when they want to force it on others, reply with null or twisted evidence; yet when attacking science, ask of it total impossible and ridiculous conditions ("you have not seen a mouse become a dog, so evolution cannot be so").

I think you do too have you submitted a DNA test to make sure your mother is your mother or do you just believe her? What evidence do you have? Don't tell me that dad mom and others told you she is your mother that doesn;t work because I got 1 billion people that say Jesus Christ is the son of God and that isn't evidence....

well once again the jews in israel have proved that the bible is full of out and out lies have you not read of the recent discoveries on the israely dessert about documents they have found reffering to the camel being a beast of burden as it states in the bible and these documents prove that the camel was not used by man until the 16th century what do you day about that christians?ok/

No, they have only a single standard and that is their holy books. If it isn't supported by their book, then they just deny the existence of the evidence or grossly distort it.

In all honesty i just believe that the complexity of life even in its most primitive form. Says very clearly that the likely hood of creation is far greater than random chance.

Yes.

None is a very low standard.

Many of them, however, have an extremely high tolerance TO evidence.