But who decides whos morality is correct?

i think while i agree with the sentiment

the fact she has so much hatred inside over meaningless words online is something to be concerned over

99% of people realise when they post on a public forum you will get the ignorant, the trolls and the haters

she needs to regulate her net time if it provokes this much hatred within her

6 times, the word hate in one small paragraph

that isnt healthy at all

She is likely just venting frustration after a painful online conflict with someone who has said hurtful things or violated her values. If someone has been unkind, such as by making personal attacks or promoting injustices, she is right to be offended. Bullying is as wrong online as it is in person. Depending on the exact situation, she might be taking things too far when she says that some opinions should not be heard. Discussing our opinions online allows us to debate them openly, which can be a useful tool for helping undecided individuals come to a conclusion. That is one reason I haven't deleted all of the racists and homophobes from my Facebook friend list. I feel that demolishing their arguments one point at a time is more useful than avoiding them. However, if they resort to name-calling or behave cruelly to other friends, it becomes my responsibility to remove them from the argument. There are certain unspoken rules to successful online combat. Personal attacks cross the line.

To state whether an opinion is worth hearing or not is, in fact, her own opinion and makes the entire thing very ironic. Ha ha ha ha.

Who decides whose morality is correct? Outside the judiciary morality is decided by the individual.