Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why do most of the world prefer to have sons over daughters!?
Exp. China and india, even Japan you are advised to throw away your daughter from birth. Now there's even a procedure to kill the female fetus in the womb once the sex is determined. Even in the U.S. people frown daughters. Why is this??
8 Answers
- Anonymous7 years agoFavorite Answer
Because they grow up to be Men. Men are intrinsically worth more than women, as Men are the most competent, complete and dominant s.e.x.
Men have a higher percentage of muscle, as well as a thicker bone structure and more spatial awareness to see the depth of the field. For this reason Men are the (physically) superior s.e.x in general, while women are considered to be the weaker, smaller, slower s.e.x.
Men are also the (mentally) superior s.e.x in general. Men have a higher IQ on average, a higher rate of intelligence, and are governed by logic and reasoning. Statistics show that sixty-six percent of Men demonstrate a preference for using causal logic, while only twenty-six percent of women prefer using causal logic. We are better at both mechanical and numerical things, and are generally more creative.
In countries where the one child policy is enforced, people prefer to have Sons over daughters, because Sons offer more value. women are seen as nothing more baby factories (preferably Male babies i.e.) and housekeepers.
- Anonymous7 years ago
I am not to sure why a lot of people prefer to give birth to one gender or another. However I know that in the olden days (Not necessary now) families would prefer to have a boy so that there son can take over the family business, which in the olden days was a big thing back then. I think it has something to do with the opinion of women belonging in the kitchen which is untrue. Back in the day a lot of people were sexist about what females could and couldn't do. It could be something to do with the opinion of males being stronger and in charge of things
Source(s): Personal Opinion Historical Views General Knowledge? - ?Lv 57 years ago
I wouldn't do it. But i understand why they do it. If this current climate is any indication on where we are headed. it seems that the more females get, male production 'as a whole' is slowing down or ceasing. And when that happens you see the cumulative effects on neighborhoods towns and cities. Men aren't lazy. Heck we built everything. The problem is for whatever reason they don't want to work with women.
Women may manage the store but if nothing is being produced. What's the point?
You need men for labor. That's the point. But not only labor but it is men's ingenuity which makes it all possible. Sure women count. But their contribution isn't as substantial as a man's, which is to say. Far more valuable overall. This isn't to cheapen women's efforts. But men 'make it happen."
Without men the machine stops. That's the bottom line.
Women don't invent and are not interested in development. That is problematic and reduces their worth. And because they spend so much and bring little to nothing their value to society becomes very small. Meager even. As a matter of fact you could say that their value is next to nothing.
This isn't sexist but a straight up fact. They inherit but they don't do much else. If we were to break it down as an investment you could say we have yet to see returns on that investment. [btw: saying that they produce babies isn't a good enough answer as it takes both females and males to make a child. So they may carry one. But they aren't making it]
Now, i'm not saying females aren't important but they are after all a part of this society and if they are not bringing in or developing than they are in fact a drag on society. Don't matter if they went to college. Because the returns on the investment are the issue. They need to better themselves. Build stuff. Be a part of a team. Not do what they are doing. They need to contribute or this stigma that they are 'useless' will persist. And no matter how many feminists phrase it. Stock market tells the tale of worth.
They may be the fairer sex but they need to either get their butts in gear and develop something or get out of the way. Cause there is no doubt that the machine is slowing down.
But i wouldn't throw my daughter away if i had one. Nevertheless i would prefer to have a male child.
Honor, integrity and self respect still count for something in my book. Most women don't subscribe to those principles. I have a problem with that.
- 7 years ago
In certain countries in Asia it is mostly because women aren't considered as smart and capable as men and most people want their children to be successful and even certain people in America feel that way. Also in a lot of countries women aren't allowed an education, so they cannot be successful.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous7 years ago
Men are intrinsically worth more than females. Males have a higher rate of intelligence than the general female, and hell, if they don't become scientists, then they can at least do manual labor.
Females are simply baby factories.
- Anonymous7 years ago
Weird people