Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

correlation coefficients....?

Is it better to analyze the coefficient of smaller areas or larger areas? Especially in regards to chlorophyll vs sea surface temperature. thanks

1 Answer

Relevance
  • gcnp58
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    It depends on the length scales of the processes you are interested in. If you are looking at the correlation as a function of distance along or across the Gulf Stream, then you want the area you analyze to be small enough to be completely contained in the Gulf Stream or completely outside of the Gulf Stream. However, you don't want it to be so small that you are looking at pixel-scale noise.

    You haven't provided nearly enough information to give anything like a definitive answer. In general however , you want the spatial scale of your sample area to be no larger than 1/2 the length of the smallest spatial scale you are interested in (this is the spatial Nyquist Theorem).

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.