In a court of law how much of the Bible would be considered hear say?

Testimony of the Evangelists by Simon Greenleaf (1783-1853)

Greenleaf, one of the principle founders of the Harvard Law School, originally set out to disprove the biblical testimony concerning the resurrection of Jesus Christ. He was certain that a careful examination of the internal witness of the Gospels would dispel all the myths at the heart of Christianity. But this legal scholar came to the conclusion that the witnesses were reliable, and that the resurrection did in fact happen.

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/jesu...

Clean that stuff off your shoes.

It is a moot question. There is no historical account that qualifies as court admissible testimony.

We have to evaluate these accounts with other approaches.

The bible is just a story book dude. Relax.

100% considering all of it was written generations after jesus had supposedly died.