Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 7 years ago

Should student loans be tax deductible when you pay them back?

the interest that is paid on the loans is... up to a limit (which more and more are going over that limit, as loans are so high these days)...

but should the entire payment of the student loan be tax deductible?

again... this isn't "paying the bill for them"... just making the difered costs of the education tax deductible in full?

also, as cons like to crow, this would be a "TAX CUT" for those that "worked hard and got an education" right?

Update:

most don't have the money to "fund" their own education at 18 years old

Update 2:

by "paid in full" do you mean "meeting the monthly payments" or "no deduction until the full amount is paid"

Update 3:

most young professionals, even young doctors, often don't make that much in the first few years... and then really make a ton later... but those student loan bills are due on the first day out of class...

Update 4:

funded through the state, while not a horrible idea... is so far off from where we currently are that it's hardly even a realistic idea for the U.S. any time in the near future... but this idea about the interest could help greatly in the meantime...

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago

    Agree with Mother Hubbard to an extent. A basic college education should be funded through the State (not the Federal) Government. Private colleges should remain unchanged in a Capitalist society. As college educations are good for the economy, it makes sense that the Federal Government is willing to underwrite the lender but I don't think there should be a tax deduction if and when a publicly funded education is available at no charge.

    In the present situation, it would help young people starting out to be able to write off their interest costs and is not a bad idea.

    EDIT

    What Mother Hubbard means is government funded college, not self funded.

    By the way, the entire thinking behind "public" school at any age has to do with the value educated people adds to our country as a whole. Up until the 1980s one could find a good paying job with nothing more than a high school diploma. Manufacturing paid a good wage due to union negotiations over the years and one could work at a factory with no additional education other than on-the-job training. Since then unions have been, for the most part, successfully defeated by capitalist lobbying and much of what remains in the non-union sector doesn't pay enough to raise a family. Today, it is far more critical to earn a college degree than it was in the past. I'm actually puzzled that the government is busy telling us we need more physicists, chemists, engineers, biologists, IT specialists, etc., but they don't do a thing about it. One day, a State will step up and fund a bachelor's degree, probably California, and the wealth of educated people that decision produces will cause a serious boost to our economy, first in California but ultimately for the country as a whole.

  • 7 years ago

    Hey I would not have a problem making student loans tax deductible, if they are paid in full and not defaulted on.

    I like any and all tax cuts.

    Yes all the tax deductions become invalid as soon as the student loan becomes delinquent.

  • Jack
    Lv 5
    7 years ago

    So in effect your saying you think You should not have to pay back money you borrow....next time someone borrows from you...tell them "dont worry about it, I will use it as a tax write off"!

  • ?
    Lv 5
    7 years ago

    I don't think an education should cost anyone anything....knowledge should be free of charge. This is the one time I agree with Hubbard.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 7 years ago

    Or reduce the interest rate, so the federal government isn't making a $43.1 billion profit off of them per year.

    Student loans should be some of the lowest interest loans in existence.

    The state of Michigan (my home state, which is why I mention this) is attempting to move forward with a "pay it forward" type system that Oregon is piloting. Essentially, attendance at a university would be free initially but after graduating you must pay 1.5% or 3% of your salary back to the university for 20 years (for a community college or four-year university, respectively).

    This is an intriguing idea, and will help students to not have massive, crushing debt when they graduate. There's things to be worked out (like should there be a 120% cap repayment based on cost of attendance, what if you don't get a job right away, etc.)

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    That would make sense.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    I wouldn't have a problem with that.As long as you couldn't deduct it all at once and only after the yearly loan amount was paid in full.

    Source(s): I meant yearly.Not waiting till you owe 50,000 then take the deductions.If you keep your loan current with no missed payments you should be able to deduct that amount over time.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Nope.

    That would basically forcing waitresses and truck drivers to fund the educations of doctors and lawyers.

  • 7 years ago

    NO- education should be FUNDED-- not BORROWED.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.