Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 7 years ago

The guy that made the video was on probation for computer fraud, do cons want to let this criminal go?

as he was convicted for computer fraud, part of his probation was that he couldn't get on a computer... yet, he obviously did when he posted a video to youtube...

why do cons want to let this computer fraudster go just because they don't like Obama?

is it OK to break the law as long as you're doing something cons think is OK? also see bundy?

Update:

kathy, yeah... you do realize that his video did cause the protests in Egypt and there was a lot of damage there, right?

yeah, they threw the book at him for that alone...

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago

    I have heard more than a few lawyers say that NO ONE on probation for computer fraud would ever have been put in jail for the extent of time this guy was. While he may be no saint, this guy was... and is... a scapegoat for the government.

    Edit:

    "... you do realize that his video did cause the protests in Egypt and there was a lot of damage there, right... yeah, they threw the book at him for that alone... "

    That's a CHILLING admission on your part. An American filmmaker gets thrown in prison for making a video! BTW, the video was NEVER seen. All people saw online was the trailer... period. The entertainment industry alone should be up in arms about that infringement of their free speech. If what you say is true about the REAL motivation behind his imprisonment... It's even more outrageous.

    So thanks for adding another log on the fire that is burning around Obama.

  • 7 years ago

    Do you see anyone wanting to let him go?? why do dimwitted dems think he was the cause of the Bengahzi attack??

  • booboo
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Gee, another lib fabrication, whoda thunk!!!.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Duck, dodge, DEFLECT!!!

    The video is no longer relevant. The White House was just using it to duck, dodge, and DEFLECT from the TRUTH.

    THE TRUTH WAS HIDDEN INTENTIONALLY, JUST WEEKS BEFORE AN ELECTION

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/11/cl...

    Benghazi talking points not shared with Clinton, Nuland says

    July 11, 2013

    'An initial version of the talking points had made references to al Qaeda and to “at least five other attacks” on foreign interests that had occurred in Benghazi prior to attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. But, following Mrs. Nuland’s input, those references were removed from a final version the White House gave to former U.N. Ambassador Susan E. Rice for dissemination on several news talk shows.

    'Mrs. Rice, who since has been named Mr. Obama’s national security adviser, made no mention of al Qaeda or terrorists on the talk shows, and instead said the Benghazi attacks had grown out of a spontaneous protest against an anti-Islam video.'

    http://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2014/04/...

    Former CIA official insists politics played no role in changes to Benghazi talking points

    April 2, 2014

    'He said the CIA knew that some of the individuals involved in the attack were al-Qaida from classified sources, information that couldn't be included unless it was declassified. The talking points were provided to members of the committee for dissemination to the American people.

    'Morell said he removed references to the warnings based on previous CIA analysis. Otherwise, he said, the talking points would have been a "way for CIA to pound its chest and say 'we warned,' laying all the blame on the State Department."'

    COVER UP!!!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.