Isn't it more logical to say "society is trying to police men's bodies" instead of women's bodies?

We are all trained to be ashamed of our naked bodies, as well as the normal scents that emanate off of them.

Clothing is not primarily for modesty, nor for protection from weather elements. They are for allowing the upper classes to show off their wealth with elegant clothing, while everyone else wears plain, functional stuff.

Women don't have it so easy. Consider what it would be like to need all those skin creams, eye makeup and freshening their lipstick throughout the day.

Feminism is utter nonsense.

Women wear what ever they want.

Anyone who judges or opposes them are raped by society.

No one is policing anyone.

Anyone who interprets woman being required to cover their nipples as being "sexist" is either a moron, or a sociopath with a feminist agenda. Since women always will be required to cover the parts of their body that are considered inappropriate by family friendly people, feminist will alway be claiming discrimination. FOREVER.

I think you're creating a straw-man and using two arguments for two different sets.

1) You assume policing bodies means forcing people to cover up. It more often means in the US shaming for weight and aesthetics in general, and we see this most often in Hollywood and the media. In some ways, women have it rougher. You don't notice the trope of the sitcom show with the overweight husband and the rather attractive wife? But I think this ebbs and flows and many parts of the media are pretty conscious of this. It's not something I lose sleep over because there are outlets of expression in today's market for so many types.

2) You allow that women don't show more of their chest because it's about what they are personally willing to reveal. Why could that not also be true of men who choose to wear longer shorts and normal un-v-necked shirts? So that's one thing.

Basically I don't know of men who want to wear short shorts. And there is nothing in my day to day life or in the media that suggests this is an actual fashion thing. People respond to the fashion trends. If it were the case that a man was attempting to set a trend by wearing something you describe and he was shamed for that, then I would agree there is actual policing. Right now all you are talking about is the fact, the one we are all subject to, that people respond to fashion trends.

Not exactly, because if you look at it both genders are sexualized and controlled to an extent. And if you think about it, society is so bad about ones body that female nipples are taboo. They are seen as a sexual thing, which isn't the case for men. So much to the point where females can even breast feed their children because society sure doesn't want to give the "wrong idea" about what breast are for. Though it's fair to say that yes, men's fashions can be a little more covered and is marketed, females are equally objectified.