Is there a term for this journalistic ambiguity?

Often you will hear stories in which injuries are clumped together in such a way as to make serious injuries seem much more common than they are. Here is a made-up, slightly exaggerated example:

47% of students in the South report that they have been violently assaulted, bullied or teased.

Sounds like a very dire situation, but if one looks at the data:

Violent assault - 0.1%

Bullied - 4%

Teased - 43%

So while the numbers are true, they are, at the same time, somewhat misleading. Does this fallacy have a name?