Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

About Pascal's wager?

So let's say (pick a religion) is the true one and a person decides that it is better to follow this instead of following what he, so far, knows to be true. Disregarding the fact that this argument can be used on behalf of any faith; would it not be self destructive to follow this "just in case" way of life? I mean, you would be living a lie and unless the god of choice is a fool you would be condemned either way.

11 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Great question, but just in case, I'm gonna have another party tomorrow.

  • 6 years ago

    Yes. Which is why virtually no Christian philosopher or theologian in history has ever taken Pascal's Wager seriously. Except for maybe Pascal.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    There's a lot of ways to argue against Pascal. However, my biggest issue is that it implies that you can simply turn faith on or off. I mean, no matter how many motions I go through in order to hedge my bets, I can't just make myself believe. So the whole idea that there's even a choice is what defeats Pascal for me.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    Yeah, that's one of the fails of Pascal's Wager. It assumes that [insert deity of choice here] would be satisfied with "lip service" belief, just to cover your butt.

    Theists who invoke the wager in this way obviously don't have a very high opinion of their deity's integrity.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 6 years ago

    Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.

    -Blaise Pascal (Pensees, 1670)

    Pascal's Wager Refuted!

    http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/nogod/pascal.htm

    "While men are gazing up to Heaven, imagining after a happiness, or fearing a Hell after they are dead, their eyes are put out, that they see not what is their birthright." -- Gerrard Winstanley, The Law of Freedom, 1652

  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    would god pay off on such a wager.

    even Las Vegas does not allow "card counting" which is a legal way to put the odds slightly in your favor

    A better question is "why would a good god condemn ANYONE!

  • 6 years ago

    There are about 3000 gods. No evidence for any of them. That means you can only randomly pick one and hope to get the correct god. This leaves you with a 99.97% chance to pick a false god. Whatever you do, chances are 99.97% that you worship the wrong god.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    It's not just about "following" a religion, but somehow forcing yourself to believe its teachings are true, which is impossible if you are not already compelled by the evidence.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJNhIzRk-eA

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    Suppose we’ve chosen the wrong god. Every time we go to church we’re just making him madder and madder. - Homer Simpson

  • 6 years ago

    But all religions are the "true religion" to the people who practice them , so you can stick to the one you have faith in.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.