John Kerry didn't ask for any hostages to be released, and now it's come to light that the Iranians will inspect themselves.?

What is amazing is the left wing liberals that answered this question and condemned America for it's actions. Do they hate America that much? The idea that the Iranians will inspect any part of the nuke sites by themselves is beyond stupid. This deal is already being violated with the Russians agreeing to sell missiles to Iran. The hostages were not important to Obama and only the idea of having some kind of deal is important to him for his so called legacy. Just as bill clinton made a deal with north korea that they soon violated Iran will violate this deal and get a nuke and then they will use it. They are that bat sh1t crazy.

Does sound a bit suspicious, eh? That guy Kerry is a real deal-maker, eh? I don't think I'd want him and his boss making deals for me.

Iranians inspecting themselves is laughable - but appears to be the case.

Well we don't know. And I don't think you know exactly what happened in those meetings either. The 47 that sent the dreaded letter may know even less. If you tell them everything they run tell everything. Sometimes, Especially, when you realize who you are dealing with, Its best to stay silent around them.

Yep. Why don't I get to do my auto safety inspection myself? That should be good.

Just like his 3 purple hearts. Kerry wrote his own paperwork up.

And had some dufus drunk Navy Capt, He knew to sign off on them.

Thats what you get from Team Kerry and Obama. LIE CHEAT and

STEAL.

John Kerry and Barack Obama.... THE INCOMPETENCE TWINS.

John Kerry helped the North Vietnamese cause so much that they placed a picture of him in their victory museum in Hanoi.

http://www.25thaviation.org/johnkerry/

Vietnam hopes John Kerry will be the next president

wonder why?

The extent of you rightwing types' lack of knowledge is rather astounding!

First, to address the topic of hostages: STOP AND THINK, asker! By remaining low-key and keeping negotiations for the prisoners (not hostages...the people in question were arrested for what Iranian authorities considered to be crimes in Iran) out of prominence, Iran is not likely to place more value on these prisoners just because we are all hyped up over their release. If the Iranian leaders think the U.S. is calm on the issue, the prisoners' value will not be exploited and more Americans will not be arrested only to become pawns in the power games! Use your head, here!

The top-secret stuff neither you nor I can know, but my guess is that due to our past crooked behaviors towards Iran through the CIA and in alliance with oil-greedy Great Britain, Iran does not trust the U.S. or our intelligence community, and with plenty of reasons. The Iranian culture is one of saving face and fierce pride---so if Iran wants to lead the inspections for the agreement, accompanied by the IAEA personnel from the UN, this is not something to which we are in a position to object. As is, without the P5+1-forged agreement, Iran is free to develop nuclear weapons, to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, to have unrestricted numbers of centrifuges, and to enrich plutonium (the substance that makes a bomb go "boom!") and will probably have a nuclear weapons program within the next two years. WITH THE AGREEMENT, however, Iran's internationally banked assets frozen by President Obama (the harshest sanctions in history) will be gradually eased---but with "Snap Back" provisions if Iran does not comply with the terms of the Agreement---in exchange for Iran giving up 95% of its centrifuges, giving up any weapons-grade uranium enrichment, giving up plutonium enrichment, allowing unlimited access by the IAEA for confirmation of compliance, and giving up its quest for nuclear weapons for at least 15 years! Two years...vs...15 years...hmmm...which way to go? Seems elementary.

You guys are so ready to get scared and make stuff up, If a mouse came into your room you would jump up on the table and scream. Benghazi! Emails! Diplomacy! Help! Benghazi! Emails! Diplomacy! Help! Benghazi! Emails! Diplomacy! Help!

If a TV cable guy came to your house to inspect a problem with your service, wouldn't you want to lead him to the cable box? Isn't it a tad unreasonable to expect them to let us into their facilities unaccompanied?

I'm guessing that claim is the usual misrepresentation.