Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Right or wrong theory?
This theory (large meteoroid or comet impact)is teach years in the schools and even universities.regarding there's no sign of such impact in the earth body and no sign of meteoroid large in that scale. .Bones founded are cause of despoil in the soil without any burn signs ,that mean cause should be something more like virus (group mass bones)The most the Dino bones were found close to the lakes of water ,which no sign of the tooth or damages such as fight or burn was found in the bones .There are many causes that can kill animal in a large scale ,such as oxygen level ,water contamination ,diseases,sulfur gas level .Oil spill,Heat struck and as they live close together on group ,contamination act faster.Other discovery show that bones were found in different layer of the soil with years distance ,which mean is a point of return or immigrant for the dinosaurs in a particular time or season .A mass dead like fishes in last decade caused by ocean contamination show that mass extinction can be take place without any physical damage to the earth structure .Is in study that level of the CO2 if rise above the normal can cause mass excitation as well (hyperventilation).Also sun radiation can cause Nero damage to point which nerve system completely get disable and cause imminent dead in manner of the minutes .
2 Answers
- scowieLv 66 years agoFavorite Answer
The impact theory is definitely wrong. Large asteroids entering our atmosphere always explode high up in the atmosphere with only small fragments reaching the ground. As a result they only ever do damage on a local level — Tunguska is a good example. The massive craters that we find on earth are caused either by volcanism or an electric discharge between a comet and the earth: https://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/060...
Chicxulub (the alleged "impact" location) can't be an impact crater because we find undisturbed Upper Cretaceous layers there that would have been vaporized if there had been a massive impact. It is probably volcanic: http://www.b14643.de/Chicxulub_event/
A good book on this topic that I recommend is: 'The Great Dinosaur Extinction Controversy' by Charles Officer
- MorningfoxLv 76 years ago
Wrong. There is lots of evidence of an asteroid impact; ever heard of the Chicxulub crater? Or the K-T boundary clay? Besides, that "theory" is a bunch of strung-together words and clauses without much grammatical structure. It certainly doesn't refer to any accepted evidence for its claims.
WTF is "Nero" damage? Nero was an Roman emperor, he certainly had nothing to do with dinosaurs. Whatever strange thing you are talking about, the sun radiation does not kill "in a manner of the minutes".