Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Does this argument for Evolution make any sense to anyone else? Or is for Creation?

In a discussion about evolution I mentioned about how I have a hard time umderstanding all that is from the Big Bang with no direction towards perfection and purpose. And this was a response below (I believe it was intended for evolution )

"Anyone whose objections are based on what you can expect from explosions is proving that he knows absolutely nothing about the relevant science."

Seems like it actually would be against both theories.

Your thoughts.

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    if evolution was true it would be a supernatural act of itself

    evolution takes blind faith

  • 5 years ago

    First of all, the Big Bang was not an explosion. It was an inflation of space/time that produced the present universe.

    Second, the Big Bang is only tangentially connected to evolution, in that without the even that started the universe, evolution could not exist.

    Life itself did not begin with the "Big Bang", it only began 9 billion years later, when life developed on Earth. (Life may have began, and evolved on other places in the universe, but as far as we know at this moment, Earth is the only place that has life). Exactly how life began is not known, but there's nothing that indicates it required a miraculous event. However it began, life has been evolving for at least 3.8 billion years, and continues to evolve. Evolution does not have a direction, and does not have a purpose. It's an automatic process that happens whenever there are populations that reproduce imperfectly. Any appearance of design is the result of natural selection acting as a non random filter on the random mutations produced by DNA reproduction.

  • 5 years ago

    Life does NOT violate any law or rule of Chemical Thermodynamics. Any reaction possible with life is also possible without life. Abiogenesis had an entire planet with large oceans, organic compound rich oceans, both the sun and the earth's core for energy sources and a few billion years. Given all that, life was a thermodynamic certainty.

  • 5 years ago

    In a discussion about evolution I mentioned about how I have a hard time umderstanding all that is from the Big Bang

    - Obviously you are an idiot, one has nothing to do with the other.

    Seems like it actually would be against both theories.

    - Now you have tried to relate three completely unrelated items.

    Your thoughts.

    - I have thoughts, you obviously do not.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    What makes you think there should be any direction towards perfection and purpose? There is no evidence that such a thing exists.

    Evolution is about being "just about good enough to survive long enough to produce enough offspring".

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    The lack of the biogenetic law proves that evolution never occured and can't occur.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    AN EXPLOSION IN A PRINTING SHOP CAN PRODUCE ATHEISTS BOOKS ?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.