Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 5 years ago

So, Democrats don't care that Hillary Clinton is extremely careless when handing classified information?

"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

-- FBI Director James B. Comey

Update:

@SD

"I forgive her for being careless"

Nice excuse.

LOL

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 5 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yep. The FBI had a problem after letting Petraeus off with a misdemeanor charge, so they recommended nolo pros to keep the egg off the Bureau's face.

    On the other hand, we're likely to have a Commander in Chief who hasn't the sense to manage classified materials as is expected of every E-2 grunt in the military. But then they're peons, not members of the New Nobility, and not close to being elected Queen---I mean, President.

  • Alice
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    She was not doing anything particularly unusual or illegal at the time. Government information technology has long lagged far behind, and both Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice, her predecessors at Secretary of State, did the same.

    You may recall that the Pentagon and the Veterans' Administration databases are unable to interface with each other, due to incompatible software. When you award contracts to the lowest bidders, which is the norm with many government services, you generally don't ride the cutting edge, I am sorry to say.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Libs: No one is perfect. It was an oversight that has been rectified. Focus on Hillary's strengths. Stop dividing the country. Let's move on. Water under the bridge. Let bygones be bygones. Let's look to the future. Let's not get stuck in the past.

    Blah, blah, blah...

  • 5 years ago

    no.

    hillary could hack someone's head off on live television, and her faithful followers would still support her and vote for her.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 5 years ago

    I forgive her for being careless, especially in computer related stuff. Nobody is perfect, and she is remarkable herself.

    Looking back, have u been extreme careless once in your job or life?

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    I would not say that Democrats "do not care"; it is a matter for concern. However, we do not find that it renders a person unqualified to be President, as opposed to her opponent who is probably the least qualified person every to be nominated by a major political party.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    They do not. It's gotta be some kind of brainwashing.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    Notice also he didn't say they violated any laws. You cons lost BIG, HUGE......YUGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.