Public Transportation over Cars?

First off, how would it decrease homeless people?

Second, it wouldn't work in small towns. I live in a small town, and there's just no way a public transportation system could be efficient for us. Out here, we need cars.

Nobody seems able to build them without them becoming ridiculously expensive!

$68-billion California bullet train project likely to overshoot budget and deadline targets

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-bull...

What I think will actually happen is once they get self-driving cars functioning better, people may give up their own cars and call for rides on demand, rather than accommodating a fixed schedule public transportation system.

Only for large cities where buildings are close together. It doesn't make sense everywhere else. In suburban areas where stores and homes are spaced out you would still need a car to get around.

Less comfort

Unconvinient

Faster spread of communicable disease

Expensive public works projects

Hell no. Public transportation follows fixed routes and its own schedule. If you had a job then you would learn that it is not feasible.

Less routine traffic stops- less police shootings,

less expense, less waste- less oppression...

Public transit frees up the WRONG sorts of people! Cars win over public transit in adding MORE OPPRESSION!

Who do you think dragged us into WWII? Korea? was it GM?

Thy DESIGNED our world- Our WORK-Merika!

Yes. It would be great. But we have too many illegals, refugees, and their offspring to feed. No money for things like that. We can't even have a proper space program.

Agree but to an extent. People should be able to drive themselves places.

~Aizen

no