Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 6

Can you see from a mirrored perspective? The GOOD in the BAD? The BAD in the GOOD? Similarities.... likeness?

It just makes me feel as if EVERYTHING is an illusion and can be deeply interpreted. This deep interpretation is normally in simplicity...

Like the whole good and bad concept. If bad things didn't happen, we wouldn't appreciate the good things that do happen...

Then I compare good to light, and bad to darkness.

If darkness did not exist, we would be blinded by the light.

If light did not exist, we would be blinded in the darkness.

They both need to coexist, in order to create this physical experience.

Why is it that I find likeness in differences?? Do you see it, too?

Another quick example from the R&S category...

"How can a rational human being believe in God?"

"How can a rational human being 'disbelieve' in God?"

"Christians! Prove to me that God exists!"

"Atheists! Prove to me that God doesn't exist!"

These questions are opposite, yet they are alike. They serve the same purpose. Are we even aware of this likeness??

2 Answers

Relevance
  • Alan H
    Lv 7
    4 years ago

    Is it OK if I come and best yo up whilst looking through a mirror?

  • 4 years ago

    I can appreciate the good things in life just fine without any negative inference. This comparison is in error. There is no need for negativity to enjoy what is positive. Negativity seeks to destroy what is positive.

    If enlightenment blinds you you have a real challenge with perceptions. Light only blinds us when we have adjusted our sight to darkness.

    God gave us a perfect world. We rejected it and God by choosing negativity to replace the light. This was necessary to illogical people to prove to them that a knowledge of good and evil was not necessary to a fullfilling life. The belief was always illogical and all the negativity and suffering we experience today is due to this illogical attitude playing out in the human experience. It was always illogical and still is today. What you propose is illogical, a holdover from our illogical pre-historic past.

    This attitude will pass when enlightenment is achieved. What we see as too bright today will become normal light in the future.

    You want me to prove that God exists. Thats too easy. Lets establish some rules, shall we? Do you agree to only accept the scientific method and nothing else, just pure science that is apparent and repeatable?

    Good lets begin. Intelligent design has always had an intelligent designer. We have no example where random or unintelligible forces have ever created anything intelligent. Every experiment we have has shown that unintelligible forces when left to themselves have devolved to a lower level of design not an equal or higher level of productivity.

    This is the scientific process in action. Its what we have left when we remove everything but science.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.