If the Earth is flat and there was a global flood, why didn't everything just pour over the sides? Don't answer that. I don't care?

it did and that's how fossils r made

If you fail to confirm your starting ASSUMPTIONS before jumping to the conclusions, two errors do not make a right or truth.

You would have to be estranged from reality and the evidence, in total denial, to become delusional enough to think you "know" something when you can't possibly know anything if you've never confirmed anything or established a fact in evidence.

Your "Earth is flat" statement is utter nonsense - that was dreamed up by Washington Irving and no actual historian recognizes it as valid.

Anyone with common sense then or now could see the shadow of the round Earth on the Moon at the time of an eclipse.

Flat Earth was disproven 180 years ago, but delusional and ignorant atheists don't do homework, research, or confirmation with fact and keep bringing it up because they're reading propaganda.

Atheist secularists interpret Isaiah 40:22 to mean a flat circle or flat disk, primarily based on Seely's "flat earth" view. If we accept the opinions of Seely, we must grant him the honor of telling us which parts of God’s Word are actually worthy of our attention.

Or, you believe the common assumption that people once universally believed the earth was flat before science “proved” otherwise (which wasn’t the case—only a few bought into the idea that the earth was flat).

Ironically, the Bible describes the earth as round and hanging in space—long before this could have been directly observed (Job 26:10; Isaiah 40:22).

Now to take this false presumption of delusional myth and compare it to a historical event recorded and verified in history would further show you are either stupid or insane.

For example, Noah's grandson, Cush, is named in the Sumerian King's List outside the Bible, confirming the Bible, and the Bible confirming science.This is corroborated historical fact, not myth as you so easily misrepresent truth.

If you want to play pretend, go play with the children. Propagandist liars are not needed here.

The Great Pyramids of Egypt sit atop the fossil-bearing strata of Noah's Flood, showing which came first.

The Chicxulub crater on the Yuccatan in Mexico dug into the fossil-bearing zone of Noah's Flood, but probably came soon after or even during the last stages of a year-long, mountain-covering, world-restructuring event.

The Flood would have laid down layers of mud full of dead things (now rocks and fossils) covering immense areas, having been deposited under catastrophic conditions. A proper interpretation of the rocks and fossils speaks of a global, dynamic, watery catastrophe: the biblical Deluge. There would be evidence, like the huge coal fields of central USA, previously thought to be made in a swamp from peat moss over millions/billions of years (this according to historical science, while empirical science has proven otherwise—the coal originated from tree bark, not pond scum in a swamp). There would be evidence like the Sauk or Tapeats or the chalk layers covering continents, and extending across oceans to other continents. These pancake layers of sediment cover two-thirds of the Earth, testifying to a much larger, much greater Flood to deposit them; The Global Deluge, Noah’s Flood.

The most authoritative book on ancient history, answering the most important questions to mankind for all time, and some want to call Genesis allegory or discard it? That's pretty sick. You kinda gotta then take a better look at what it is you believe in, your intelligence? Oops. Pride issue?

Concerning which system is the most adequate for explaining external reality, the possibility of knowledge, a relevant and binding ethic, and the significance of man, the answer should be obvious: only the worldview presupposing the truth claims of the Bible is sufficient for the task. It does not exist by "chance" or out of "nothing".

The evidence is clear, Creation is the most rational conclusion and therefore a Creator. Evolution is a fairy tale for humanists and is wholly unsupported by empirical evidence or experience.

How could you even have a GLOBAL flood on a FLAT earth?

I don't either.

I had never thought of that, very good.

CONGRATULATIONS . I remember when I reached level 7 . I thought there would be higher levels too .

Giant snakes.

Piled up around the edge.

Don't read this.

Cool about the level seven thing, but I actually am going to answer that. The flat earthers believe Antartica is a ridge of mountains surrounding the world. One that could hold the flood waters in. Though I still don't know where they think all that water went afterward.

So you're posting this question to inform us that you've hit level 7. Alright congrats superman.

Congratulations. Yes, the water poured over the side and rounded the corners.

According to Professor Hugh...

....it did EXACTLY THAT.