Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is there any reason NOT to use the heat/cool mode of a thermostat year-round?

My thermostat has four mode options: heat only, cool only, heat/cool, and off.

The home is in the desert, is not occupied daily, and the cool-only mode range tops out at 90, while the heat/cool range tops out at 95.

I’d like to save some money by keeping it at 95 when unoccupied, but not if it’s better for some reason to use cool-only.

Is there any reason NOT to use the heat/cool mode year-round?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    3 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    You could try turning it off. If the house is unoccupied, OFF is the least expensive option.

    This is just me but I think you would do better to cap the temperature at 90, even if you set it Heat-Cool.

    Heat-Cool will hold it to the limits you set. If you set it to 90, it won't let the house get hotter than 90. Then you set the Heat setting, and it won't let the house get cooler than whatever that is.

    But I bet your refrigerator will be pretty darned unhappy at 95. I get that you're not there every day and you're trying to save some money, but 95 vs. 90 isn't a big savings when compared to having to purchase a new fridge.

    Also worth considering: install a programmable thermostat, and run the AC for a few hours at night to pull the house's temperature way down. My understanding is that deserts get pretty darned cool at night, which means the AC will have a much easier time of it, and it may be able to pull the house's overall temperature down enough that it doesn't get as hot as all that during the day.

    Good luck with it.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    3 years ago

    uniform humidity keeps wood in the structure supple,well fitting and prevented from buckling as the other guy stated

  • M.
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    You could use the heat/cool and set it to 95, but you need to understand where the thermostat would attempt to energize the heat.

  • 3 years ago

    No. No advantage of either setting.

    BUT, letting the house get to 95 or even 90 degrees seems pointless. You may as well let it get to ambient temperature. The real cost comes in when you cool the house for comfort. If it is 90 or 95 degrees to start with will make little difference.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • roger
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    cool only would be better.

    Heat/cool would try to keep your house at 90 when it was cooler outside -- using much heat...

  • 3 years ago

    I can't think of a reason to keep it any cooler. Moisture is your enemy but that's not a problem. Mold needs cool and moisture that a dry 95 degree space will not support. No warping either.

  • 3 years ago

    Keeping it so hot for a long period of time can damage the interior of the house. It can get moldy, floors can buckle, damage to paint, etc. Most recommend 85 as the max temp.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.