Why did gods give human embryos tails?

I don't know what happens inside a woman that's none of my business where the baby comes out wearing a tail it goes straight into surgery and gets the tail removed tails don't belong on human beings.

Slightly off topic, but, to all the anti-evolutionists..

We didn't evolve from a watery beginning, huh?

Ever seen tadpoles? A reasonable amount of resemblance to the human embryos in question, wouldn't you agree?

It seems a very efficient mode of transport. So why would god want us humans to be similar to creatures way down the food chain from ourselves?

I thought we were 'special'?!

A remnant of our ancestors who had tails.

People deny evolution because they haven't figured out that the Genesis passage was written to people who were herding sheep 3000 years ago. These sheep herders did not know about quantum relativity, string theory, Higg's boson or time frames of billions of years. The purpose of the Genesis account is about who (God) made the Universe, not about when or how He made it.

The Time line of Creation

http://www.rareuniverse.org/timeline.html

I wish I had a tail.

The human vestigial tail is a genetic remnant of our primate past, back to when we diversified from the other members of the great apes.

Easier to abort them with.

The gods didn't do that. Those tails are a legacy of our evolutionary history.

Apparently, according to the resident brain dead methodist, the embryo needs a tail to swim towards an egg. Nevermind that an embryo is well beyond the egg stage. I thought she was just ignorant about religion. How did she manage to breed?

A remnant from our primate origins.

they can move toward the egg...TIRH...ONE GOD IN THREE FORMS...God is not plural.