Atheists who keep asking for a physically tangible God what do you think Christ is?

JC was a brilliant philosopher who recognized that mankind was inherently weak; so mankind needed to feel special. And JC built upon the Jewish faith and borrowed from the Hindis to create a philosophy of love thy neighbor and do unto others. It seems to have worked as the Christian faith has been around and strong for two millennia.

But JC was not a god and he never claimed to be. It was the Paulists some 300 years AD that created the so-called Trinity myth. They wrote the Trinity into the Bible; so don't quote that book as "proof".

Jesus is nothing more than a recycled myth. Furthermore the idea that he was actually god in human form is one interpretation of the myth. After all , while hangin around on the cross, Jesus repeatedly calls on god as a seperarate being . You guys are constantly changing your story, and that's all it is A STORY.

I think that the Jesus of Christianity is a myth, but that doesn't mean that he wasn't based on a real person(s). I'm not completely convinced that he didn't exist. I AM, however, completely convinced that he was neither divine nor the messenger of a divine entity.

Atheists don't ask for a tangible God, we really don't care.

Theists claim God exists and demand atheists believe in God - theists need to prove God exists if they expect atheists to believe.

Christ was a preacher that died 2000 years ago, no proof he was anything else.

Atheists/anti-theists don't think it through when they demand this type of thing.

I've heard some say that they would believe in God if an amputee grew a limb back. Well, think about that: If he or only a few would witness that, the rest of the World would simply throw them in the "Christer-nut bag" group for claiming their personal experience.

And if it was televised in the news, several areas around the World would still be skeptical of the "trick" (remember the Miracle of Fatima).

And if God did this several times around the World scientists would start to say that this is a natural phenomenon, and they would eventually see the mechanism of how it occurred, "See? No Goddidit."

An equally fictional character.

I know Christ is a mythical character from a fable.

You want to claim that Jesus is God in the flesh when it's convenient, then you deny any physical evidence exists when it's convenient.

Your god has a history in the story of revealing itself to prove itself, until now, when humans require a higher standard of evidence.

How convenient.

Yet there is no physical evidence that he existed. They've found his name scribbled on a couple of rocks, and that's about it.

Christ has as much physical evidence of being an avatar of god as Krishna does. Zero.