Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Wow, Trump is actually going to make a state of union address. Is it necessary or not?

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 years ago

    He can just make it from Mar a Lago on another million dollar golf trip.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    It's required by the Constitution, but not next week and it is not required to be in the House chamber.

    In the hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's letter announcing she would not allow President Donald Trump to speak from the room she now controls, a flurry of suggestions and proposals emerged from Trump's advisers.

    What about a speech on the US-Mexico border? Or an address at Philadelphia's Independence Hall, where the Constitution was adopted? Or a stately affair inside the White House, with an audience of Republicans?

    No, Trump decided.

    In the end, all those suggestions for an "alternate" State of the Union address were too narrow, too bland and too small. Instead, the President told them, he would wait for the only venue he really wanted for the annual speech: the US House.

    While aides have still not ruled out some type of event next week to drive his message on border security and a wall, they have taken his direction and will not plan for a State of the Union address at any venue that isn't the House chamber.

    Trump may still travel south to campaign for a wall, officials said it would not be billed as a State of the Union nor would it seek to fulfill the constitutional requirement to periodically update Congress on the country's condition.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Pelosi said he could then she took it away...Just like Schumer said he could have 25 Billion, then he took it away, now he is fighting over one dime going for any wall....

  • 2 years ago

    It’s a constitutional requirement that he gives one from time to time, but the constitution doesn’t say when. Of course, the founding fathers also never expected a chief executive to shut down his own branch of government as a bargaining chip for a vanity project from another branch, so this is all new territory. Did you know that almost half of government employees are military vets?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • RockIt
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    They are absurd political spectacles.

    Team Republican: Standing Cheering as 100s of things that won't happen are laid out

    Team Democrat: Sit looking gloomy and dour, constipated and gassy

    Supreme Court: Looking a Million miles away, Wishing they were home reading a book

  • John
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    Since the state of the union is about as bad as it's been - ever - and it's his own doing. About all he can do is lie some more. I plan to skip it but I never sit through them anyway.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Do you have a source that is current?

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Are you getting your news from Fox (I mean Pravda) again?

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Wow, you are really bothered by this. Maybe it's time for some big boy pants.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Over a stupid wall? That's pathetic.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.