Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Jehovah's Witnesses. How would an unbiased person come to your 1914 date?

Say a person picks up a Bible and starts to compare it to history to see if the prophecies come true. They are able to do this successfully.

Could this person reach Watchtower doctrine?

How would they know they must argue the date of 607bc for the destruction of Jerusalem?

Why would they think they have to add another interpretation to the prophecy of Daniel?

Can someone just pick up a Bible and become a JW?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 years ago

    The major problem with the 1914 teaching is that it requires to many

    'assumptions'. It must be 'assumed' that the seven periods of time

    that Nebuchadnezzar was insane, were years—seven years exactly.

    Otherwise the counting will not work.

    It must be 'assumed' that the days in seven years are to be

    stretched out on a year-for-a-day scale spanning centuries.

    It must be 'assumed' that a year should be figured as 360

    days—in order to obtain the number 2,520—but then a different

    calendar, a solar calendar with 365 days, is used to measure to

    1914!

    It must be 'assumed' that the secular date of B.C. 536 that

    Russell used (to which the 70 years of captivity are added), is

    precisely correct, despite considerable present-day scholarship to

    the contrary.

    It must be 'assumed' that when Jesus spoke of the “times of the

    Gentiles” he was referring to 2,520 years of Gentile rule.

    The entire 1914 teaching hinges on the “seven times” of

    Nebuchadnezzar’s insanity lasting seven YEARS. If those “seven

    times” were not seven YEARS—and seven years exactly—the

    whole teaching crumbles.

    Were the seven “times” mentioned in Daniel 4 seven years?

    The word translated “time” or “times” (‘iddan, H5732 in

    Strong’s Concordance)—used only in Daniel* —is recognized

    on all sides to mean simply a period of time. As Barnes’ Notes on

    the Bible, says, “...the word may refer to any such period [of

    time], however long or short—a day, a month, a year, or any other

    measure of duration.”

    It is generally believed that when ‘iddan is used in the phrase

    “a time and times and half a time” (Dan. 7:25), it does indicate a

    year, and so a period of three-and-a-half years. In the book of

    Revelation the phrase appears to be used interchangeably with

    1,260 days and 42 months (cf. Rev. 12:14; 11:2, 3).

    There are reasons to believe this phrase is probably a

    round number. In any case, to stretch 1,260 days into 1,260 years,

    would require another step entirely, one that is NOT mentioned in the

    text.

    So while ‘iddan—meaning simply a period of time—could

    mean a year, there is no indication this is the case in Daniel 4. The

    odds of that, are slim.

    If the writer had wanted to use a word that specifically means

    year in Daniel 4:25, he could have done so. Indeed, he did use this

    word in numerous other places: “In the third year of the reign of

    Jehoiakim...three years of training...Daniel continued until the first

    year of King Cyrus” (Dan. 1:1, 5, 21, etc.). That word, translated

    “year,” is #H8141 in Strong’s Concordance.

    Because ‘iddan is a word for time—regardless of length—the

    period during which Nebuchadnezzar was insane is commonly

    translated as “seven periods of time” or “seven seasons” (NLT,

    ESV, NASB, HCSB, NET, GWT, NIV, etc.). Even the New World

    Translation (published by the Watchtower Society), does not

    insert the word “years,” but (quite honestly) uses “seven times,”

    the same as the KJV, NKJV, etc.

    The scholarly Pulpit Commentary (on Daniel 4:16)—with no

    doctrine to uphold on this point, one way or another—says that

    ‘iddan means no more than “seasons” or “points” of time, adding

    that “it is purely arbitrary to fix the meaning as years.”

    If we count the “seven times” as seven seasons—figuring four

    seasons in a year—this would work out to less than two years as the

    length of Nebuchadnezzar’s insanity. That would be based on the

    way we figure seasons today.

    However, the Babylonians (as well as the Hebrews) figured

    only two seasons in a year: summer and winter (cf. Gen. 8:22; Psa.

    74:17; Zech. 14:8). By this counting, seven seasons would fit within

    a period of four years. This brings us to the words of Nebuchadnezzar

    found on an ancient inscription:

    “For four years the residence of my kingdom did not delight my

    heart. In no one of my possessions did I erect any important

    building by my might. I did not put up buildings in Babylon for

    myself and the honor of my name. In the worship of Merodach

    my god I did not sing his praise, nor did I provide his altar with

    sacrifices, nor clean the canals.”

    While Nebuchadnezzar did not use the word “insanity” in this

    quotation—perhaps because of his own personal ego—clearly, for

    some reason, his activities were interrupted during four years. His

    insanity would provide a reason.

    In a comment on the above quotation, Halley’s Bible Handbook

    (1924, p. 315) says the “seven times” should here be understood as

    “seasons.” Because the Babylonians only counted summer and

    winter, seven seasons or three-and-a-half years, would fall within

    the four year timeframe indicated. Certainly—if correct—this

    would rule out seven “times” meaning seven years.

    The word ‘iddan was also used for a point in time. In Babylon,

    for example, at whatever “time” [‘iddan] certain music was

    played, all were to fall down and worship the Golden Image that

    Nebuchadnezzar set up (Daniel 3:5,15). This, a mere point in time,

    certainly did not mean a year.

    Still another variation: The word translated “times” in Daniel is

    from a root corresponding to H5708 in Strong’s Concordance. It

    appears one place: Isaiah 64:6. Here—though euphemistically

    translated “filthy rags” (KJV, NKJV, NIV)—other translations, including

    The New World Translation, correctly say: “...all our

    acts of righteousness are like a garment for periods of menstruation.”

    Thus, this word is closely linked with a month.

    After a discussion of Nebuchadnezzar’s illness from a medical

    point of view, the Pulpit Commentary says, “The ‘seven times’

    certainly did not mean seven years for recovery from that form

    of insanity; that is, acute mania....Seven months is a far more

    likely period.” In agreement, The International Standard Bible

    Encyclopedia (article: “Nebuchadnezzar”), says it is likely that

    the “seven times” of Nebuchadnezzar’s insanity were seven

    months.

    The point is: If the “seven times” were ANYTHING other

    than seven full YEARS, the 1914 teaching will not work.

  • 2 years ago

    He wouldn't come to that date at all. If Jesus had returned in 1914, visibly OR invisibly, the history of the world since then would have been completely different, and World War II would never have happened. Nor would JWs have had to switch from 1914 to 1925, then to 1975, etc.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Well the man and women over in Indonesia still tell the tale of the night that the Stars fell from the sky. An unusually brilliant meteor shower and The story goes that as the falling stars came down cursing and swearing and obscene things could be heard all through the night. And then there came knocking upon the doors in the early morning and whoever opened the door. Became infected with the great plague of the 1914 to 1918 era. It's not only Jehovah's witnesses that talk about 1914 as a very significant year in Bible history most leading Bible theologians agree that 1914 was the beginning of the end

  • User
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    ...by first becoming biased.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 2 years ago

    Revelation 6-- he receives his crown, peace will be taken from the earth( ww1)--many events occur after these event in revelation. Rev 6 = war in heaven, satan cast to earth, after ww1 millions died all over the earth( the riders rode) from starvation, disease from the filth of the slaughters, etc. 1914 and on.

    If they believe Jesus, over dogma teachings they would become JW,S.

  • Otto
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    Everyone can find out that 1914 "the last Days" began.

    The year 1914 is marked by Bible prophecy. The correctness of the date is shown by the fact that world conditions foretold to mark this time period have come to pass since 1914 exactly as foretold. The facts set out above illustrate this.

    For details go to JW.org. :Dates and calculating the "seven times".

    Source(s): Bible
  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    That's when the Federal Reserve was set up

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    An unbiased person wouldn't pick up a Bible and become a Christian of any kind. Not without a preacher.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.