Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

If evolution were true, why did man and animal evolve, male and female?

We should either all be male or all be female, not both male and female. There would be no reason to reproduce. When a man dies, a new man would eventually evolve into existence. Yet we are formed with the ability to reproduce.

19 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    2 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    ITS NOT TRUE...GOD MADE LIFE BY SPEAKING!!

  • 2 years ago

    Can the questions in this category get any dumber?

  • 2 years ago

    If evolution were true, why did man and animal evolve, male and female?

    - Why not? Asexual reproduction doesn't give enough genetic variation.

    We should either all be male or all be female, not both male and female

    - To you, but then consider the source.

  • 2 years ago

    I agree.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 6
    2 years ago

    Evolution is true, and we evolved in such a way because it seemed to be most efficient way to reproduce.

  • jehen
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    Your logic indicates you do not have a firm grasp of evolution. To dismiss evolution is to dismiss science. The same science that made modern medicine a reality or the existence of this forum. One cannot rationalize away the fundamental truths of the natural world because you think those truths contradict your sacred texts. So why not look at evolution as God's method of creation instead.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Let's all hope you're trolling and that you're not really that stupid!

  • 2 years ago

    You don't seem to understand

    that life came up with sex and programmed death

    as enhancements that allowed complicated life forms

    to evolve much faster

    than if they just made clones of themselves.

    Sexual reproduction

    mixes the genetic material from two individuals,

    in random ways,

    to make many more variations

    per generation,

    than clones would,

    and spread successful genes through the population,

    much faster, too.

    In our species,

    both genders mix and match about 98 percent of our DNA,

    with only about 2% passing only from fathers to sons.

    So males evolve just a bit slower than females,

    because that unmixed 2% is essentially cloned,

    every generation.

    Human males are just females,

    with a few mods (2%), anyway.

    Programmed death

    gets the older generation out of the way of the new trials,

    instead of competing with them.

    Without these enhancements,

    we would probably still be

    no more complicated than sponges.

    I like that trade-off.

    Have you been insistent

    about not learning how evolution works?

    --

    Regards,

    John Popelish

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Because, moron, sexual reproduction leads to greater variety than asexual reproduction, and is therefore favored in a real-world situation. You are pretending that sexual reproduction started in Homo sapiens, but the fact is, it began with the amoeba.

  • 2 years ago

    Sexual reproduction is advantageous because it increases genetic diversity, which makes us more adaptable to our environment. What makes you think things should be the way you describe them?-

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    LOL. Yes it's all about dirt man and rib woman.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.