how come the zombies in matt 27:52 were not noticed by any contemporary observers (including the authors of Mark Luke and John),?

Zombies?

Perhaps you should do some reading before making ignorant comments about the practice of Voodoo.

"For decades Westerners considered zombies little more than fictional movie monsters, but that assumption was questioned in the 1980s when a scientist named Wade Davis claimed to have found a powder that could create zombies, thus providing a scientific basis for zombie stories. Davis didn't believe in voodoo magic. But he did believe that he had found something that could poison victims into a zombie-like state: a powerful neurotoxin called tetrodotoxin, which can be found in several animals including pufferfish. He claimed to have infiltrated secret societies of bokors and obtained several samples of the zombie-making powder, which were later chemically analyzed."

https://www.livescience.com/23892-zombies-real-fac...

atheist trolling ******************** ************************ *************************

Only zombies in religion would be a new age Christian or newer. Who changes the bible and believes it all means zombies. Until it happens which is not yet occurred.

So it strikes you as odd that only one of the four canonical Gospel writers remembered to mention that graves opened and the dead were wandering the streets? Why? Doesn't that kind of thing happen all the time? Who would find that the least bit unusual?

.

Obviously, everyone would. It would be the talk of the world. They would have heard about it in China. Certainly the post-contemporaneous historians such as Josephus and Tacitus would have recorded it, but none did. So either it happened and no one thought to talk about it afterward, or it never happened at all, and the biblical story is nonsense. I know which of those I believe.

.

.

Zombies are not alive. Those people were brought back to life. End of story.