Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

square enix?

When I play a square enix game like FFX for example, I noticed that any time that the game had a cutscene they would switch to a pre-rendered version to make the game look better graphically, but when they weren't using a pre-rendered version of the cutscene it looked like dog ****. It looked so ******* bad that it make's sonic adventure 2 look like ******* pixar. Holy ****. Why the **** is this?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yo mama’s square

  • 7 months ago

    Do you prefer the low-frame instability of Kingdom Hearts III?

  • 7 months ago

    Square Enix games are for *******, go outside

    Source(s): Your favourite devil
  • 8 months ago

    Lol the last part is honestly a joke I really dont know why you guys got so triggered over me saying that sonic adventure 2 looks better when it probably does. The meaning of this question and the main plot wasn't about why the game look's bad It's about why they ended up wasting their time with a ******* amazing rendered cutscene that your right! it does look good now. But the game's main graphic source isn't that good. I know you might think it look's good now because that's all you ******* play but listen man, I've gotten some decent anwser's from you guys but I don't get how this can be misunderstood. 

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Mike
    Lv 5
    8 months ago

    To make an entire game have the same quality as a FMV, would have cost a fortune back then.  This is assuming the tech was even available or the hardware to support it.

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    FFX is an early generation PS2 game, over 15 years old. The PS2 hardware wasn't capable of running in-game graphics that could match the special more-detailed cutscenes. The in-game graphics were simpler because that's all the PS2 could handle at the time. Square's developers were still learning the newer hardware.

    Regardless, it looked MILES beyond the weaker Dreamcast games. Hell, it still looks pretty nice even now. You must be blind or something. The current ports of FFX are going to look understandably dated, because the game is super old.

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    sonic is crap and past it's sell by date, so who cares..

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.