Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
This is about infinite tetration. see details?
I put up a message asking if the infinite hyper root of 1000 equals 1000^ (1/1000). Some one confirmed that the answer to x^^ infinity is always x^(1/x).
One source claims that the range for x is e-e < x < e1/e
And that is fine, because 3^(1/3), 5^(1/5) etc falls in that range. But this source says that the Y values are only 1/(ee) < y < e(1/e)
That apparently means that (3^(1/3) ^^ infinity is not the cubed root of three.
Even worse this implies that anything above e^(1/e) diverges. So is there no answer to x^^infinity= 50, because 50 is greater than the Y range? How can this be?
This site {http://www.faculty.fairfield.edu/jmac/ther/tower.h... claims this saying "It would seem then that x would equal the cube root of 3 when solving the equation y = 3, but this is not the case. In fact, this procedure will only work when
e-1 < y < e so that 1/(ee) < y < e(1/e)
This has been established by Knoebel [I] and Mitchelmore [2] in their treatments of iterated exponentials. Knoebel introduces the notation nx for these 'hyperpowers' where x, xx, xxx ., . . are
written1x,2x, 3x . . . and y in the example above would be the limit of the sequence y = lim nx.
as n approaches infinity. He then proves that the sequence {nx} converges only in the interval
e-e < x < e1/e
"
can any refute this or confirm this?
Be the first to answer this question.