Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
If the authors of the 2nd Amendment wanted guns to be regulated, why would they specifically add that the right "shall not be infringed"?
at the end?
Wouldn't that be contradictory?
If not, then what shouldn't be infringed?
James, yes the phrase "well regulated" is in the 2nd Amendment. Followed by the word "militia." Thus it is the militia that is supposed to be well regulated.
Now how about answering my question about why the authors wrote "shall not be infringed" after stating the right?
4 Answers
- 6 days agoFavorite Answer
Never let a Liberal "interpret" The Bill of Rights for you.
- 6 days ago
We require insurance, driving tests, have seat belt laws, have laws against going out loaded and require persons to register their vehicles in which if someone moves to a new state they have to do all that over again. Why shouldn't we use the same logic for firearms?
- Anonymous6 days ago
The problem of the second Amendment when it comes to liberals is that they know in the future if they try to push hard on their socialist policies these people will guns won't let them. So that's why they want to do whatever they can to chip away at the second Amendment every time they have the majority in Congress.
