Dale R

But know this, in order to be a legal state, they must have their boundaries in their state constitution. Surprise surprise, bet many of you didn't know that. I will tell you that Kentucky and Tennessee are the most eastern states and there are no other legal states touching them.

Im thinking about buying a house and wanted to know which one I could trust the most.

I have purchased some and my printer isn't printing anything as of yet, I have been trying for somewhat of an hour. What is the problem

I am on a yahoo account. I dont want to create another email address, there must be an easy way to lock these out!

I bought A used one off of ebay, With no instructions, would be thankful for this info. Thank you

Who will prevent him from taking office? Will there be another elections?

The Supreme Court is to decide, Monday, to look into these allegations of him not being born in the USA.

I think color means more to them than the issues or the constitution.

do you think the ignorant U.S. citizens would believe this nonsense?

I don't believe so, they are worse than any form of government, there is nobody there to complain to. It takes a while before people find out of Yahoos lack of caring and corruption, within its system. Perhaps this is why Yahoo was sued. But still they use the american system, for wealth only.

Would you still use yahoo? We know how the communists controlls freedom of speech and prevents talking againts their powers, well a little worse than Yahoo does today, I guess it doesnt matter, Yahoo is on the verge of being just as bad.

People can delete others questions and replies, and Yahoo gives us a false chance to challenge the deletion, but will not allow it to be overturned.

If I posted a question, what are the prettiest flowers? and had members delete it, and I challenge the deletion, the computer generated reply would not allow it to be overturned.

So it opens the door to us to try to delete every question and reply, that we donot agree with. This is what is being done by some today, and they have found it works.

If Jimmy Carter become a UN Representive of six hundred and sixtysix parties or religions, could he be then the Anti Christ?

Military losses, 1980 through 2006

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed

Forces is, consider the following statistics: The

annual fatalities of military members while actively

serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006:

1980 .......... 2,392 (Carter Year)

1981 .......... 2,380 (Reagan Year)

1984 .......... 1,999 (Reagan Year)

1988 .......... 1,819 (Reagan Year)

1989 .......... 1,636 (George HW Year)

1990 .......... 1,508 (George HW Year)

1991 .......... 1,787 (George HW Year)

1992 .......... 1,293 (George HW Year)

1993 .......... 1,213 ( Clinton Year)

1994 .......... 1,075 ( Clinton Year)

1995 .......... 2,465 ( Clinton Year)

1996 .......... 2,318 ( Clinton Year) Total Clinton years

1997 ............ 817 ( Clinton Year) (1993-2000): 14,000

1998 .......... 2,252 ( Clinton Year)

1999 .......... 1,984 ( Clinton Year)

2000 .......... 1,983 ( Clinton Year)

2001 ............ 890 (George W Year)

2002 .......... 1,007 (George W Year)

2003 .......... 1,410 (George W Year)

2004 .......... 1,887 (George W Year) Total George W years

2005 ............ 919 (George W Year) (2001-2006): 7,932

2006............. 920 (George W Year)

2007……….....899 (George W Year)

If you are surprised when you look at these figures,

so was I. These figures mean that the loss from the

two latest conflicts in the Middle East are LESS than

the loss of military personnel during Bill Clinton's

presidency; when America wasn't even involved in a

war!

And, I was even more shocked when I read that in 1980,

during the reign of President (Nobel Peace Prize

winner) Jimmy Carter, there were 2,392 US military

fatalities!

I think that these figures indicate that many members

of our Media and our Politicians will pick and choose

the information on which they report. Of course we

all know that they present only those 'facts' which

support their agenda-driven reporting. But why do so

many of them march in lock-step to twist the truth?

Where do so many of them get their marching-orders for

their agenda? Obviously there is one shared agenda,

and I believe it is clear it comes from the most

powerful Democratic family of the decade.

Do you want further proof? Consider the latest census,

of Americans. It shows the following FACTS about the

distribution of American citizens, by Race:

European descent (white)....69.12%

Hispanic ...................12.5%

Black ......................12.3%

Asian .......................3.7%

Native American .1.0%

Other .......................2.6%

Now... here are the fatalities by Race; over the past

three years in Iraqi Freedom:

European descent (white) ...74.31%

Hispanic ...................10.74%

Black .......................9.67%

Asian .1.81%

Native American .............1.09%

Other .0.33%

I was surprised again.....until it became clear to me

that the point here is that our mainstream media

continues to spin these figures (for political gain).

Nothing more.

It's all about politics and some politicians, who are

now famous for turning American against American for a

vote. (Consider Slick Willy and his comments just

recently made about South Carolina, Jesse Jackson, and

the 'blacks' voting for the 'black' candidates); or

Hillary's stump speech after her Super Tuesday

'victory' stating that the current administration does

not 'listen' to anyone and continues the war costing

precious American lives. Yes, I might even agree with

her, but she should be made to acknowledge her own

husband's administration, without having an actual

war, sent more soldiers to death during his

regime—while also forcing the military to release

Osama when we actually had him detained.

I hope that during the time between now and November,

that intelligent Americans can decipher the facts from

the spin and the spinners from the leaders; those who

seek even more power from those that seek justice, the

dividers from the uniters.

Over the next months let's be good listeners (yes,

Hillary we are listening) and see and hear who tries

to divide our nation; and who wants to unite our

nation. Who wants to control how our money is spent

and who wants our money spent the way we would spend

it. Who seeks power and who seeks justice? Who spins

the facts and who is genuine.

(These statistics are published by Congressional

Research Service, and they may be confirmed by anyone

at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

Every time I have brought up Yahoo's liberal bias views, I have had my question deleted. Under the terms that it is not a question. So again, am I a prophet? Before this is deleted as well.

http://www.liutilities.com/products/campaigns/affi...

I have had a number of my questions and answers removed, because I refer to African Americans as Black Americans. After all, they refer to me as a White American, so what is the difference? Yahoo will not tell me the reason as to why they continue to remove it. But they all carry the same common wording.

Can yahoo be anti white racist orgination?

see how long this will last