bouan philippe

According to Obama's autobiography he was brought up by his white grandparents and was raised to be aware of his white heritage and identity.

However, had he not known who his mother was then perhaps he might have assumed a different identity that is more typical of the Blacks in America.

Consequently, we must infer that the question of social, cultural and political behaviour should crucially depend on one's knowledge of oneself and one's cultural heritage.

Ultimately, such a behaviour may have to be realigned or readjusted in view of certain information coming to light.

True or false?

Such a law would apply to the majority of countries across the globe.

True or false?

They are unfortunate to have been born in China and adopted by Chinese parents, because they usually lack proficiency in their Native language and it would be difficult for them to succeed in their ancestral country.

However, they are still fortunate to have documentation that proves their Japanese identity, which gives them the right to leave China and to dissociate from the Chinese.

Such orphaned children have special rights and privileges which are not accorded to the Uighurs and Han Chinese.

Because they still have the right to dissociate from Chinese people, which is a right that other groups are denied.

Those other groups include the Uighurs and Han Chinese.

Consequently, such orphaned Japanese are more or less on a par with the whites who are also born in China, because they all have the right to leave China and to dissociate from Chinese people.

But the others in China are denied the same rights as the Europeans and Japanese.

That they have the Right to leave China and dissociate from Chinese people proves that they are superior.

True or false?

Orientals and Hispanics are more likely to migrate to North America, whereas the North Africans are more likely to migrate to France.

Because people tend to identify with their own group who are the communities already established in the destination country.

Thus, the historical precedent of migration to certain countries by certain ethnic groups is explained by the fact that people would tend to gravitate towards their own group.

Provided that the group is recognised in such terms as being their "own".

True or false?

Migration partly/largely depends on a person's race/ethnicity.

Orientals and Hispanics are more likely to migrate to North America, whereas the North Africans are more likely to migrate to France.

True or false?

The Bible provides no explicit reasons to explain the underlying origins of this conflict.

However, I believe that this Conflict is a war of reprisal (Romans 12:19 & 2 Thessalonians 1:8), but would like to obtain a second opinion as to Why this conflict has erupted.

So any suggestion?

Isaiah 24:1 Behold, the Lord makes the earth empty and makes it waste, distorts its surface and SCATTERS ABROAD ITS INHABITANTS.

Not only are they displaced refugees, but there are also colonial rulers, expeditionary forces, and foreign guest workers who are on temporary assignments in the far flung corners of the empire mentioned in Daniel 2 & 7.

True or false?

Isaiah 24:1 Behold, the Lord makes the earth empty and makes it waste, DISTORTS ITS SURFACE and scatters abroad its inhabitants.

The alleged "distortion" of the earth's surface won't happen in terms of topography, but it is simply a figurative reference to the redefinition of international boundaries and regional boundaries due to the global military expansion mentioned in Isaiah 54:3.

Consequently, the existing international boundaries, sovereign entities, and their internal 'regional' boundaries would either be changed, or they would cease to exist altogether in order to advance the cause of the Conquering nation in Daniel 2 & 7.

True or false?

By definition, the "second death" implies that you can die more than once.

After "death" of one's physical body the "resurrected spirits" can either go to heaven or hell.

This latter is called the "second death" because Christians are divided as to whether the deceased would be "annihilated" or instead suffer "everlasting torment in hell" as an immortal indestructible spirit.

Thus, the vessels of destruction (Romans 9:22) may well be condemned as being entire nations, or entire groups of people due to destruction of their national sovereignty and autonomous status, and due to the large numbers of people killed in the process (Revelation 6) to enable such a military expansion to happen (Daniel 2:34, 35, Isaiah 55), but that is not to say that the conquered peoples could never enter heaven in the spiritual world.

As attested by the fact that God is destined to save billions of souls in the spiritual kingdom of heaven (Revelation 5), but the earth itself would have only "few" survivors (Isaiah 24:6) once God has destroyed most of the people on the earth (Isaiah 24:1).

Consequently, it's not the end of the world if your country and people have been designated as "vessels of destruction", because such a "destruction" would happen in a figurative AND literal sense, due to foreign invasion, the ensuing great loss of life, and the end of this nation's sovereign autonomous status.

To invade Britain, Hitler knew that he had to destroy both the Royal Air force AND the Royal Navy to minimise the German casualties in crossing the Channel by using amphibious vehicles.

Otherwise, the combined power of the RAF and RN could easily have destroyed the German ships, troop carriers, and amphibious vehicles. 

True or false?

Because it seems to contradict the Established Order, which was invented by Europeans over a few centuries of military, economic, cultural and political domination.

Obviously, they cannot be your true friends or allies at all if they constantly vacillate between alleged 'friendliness' and overt hostility, even when it is clear that you are trying to help them.

Such 'friends' you can do without because they have proven themselves to be totally predictable/unreliable in regards to the aforementioned.

True or false?

God and the Chinese Communist Party are sworn enemies due to the Party insisting that Christ is a forcible member of the Chinese race, which is expressly against the Will of the Almighty.

Consequently, the Scripture tells us that "death", which is symbolically used to denote the Chinese Communist Party is the last nation/enemy to be defeated.

Because China will ultimately be invaded by a Western nation, the Communist Party will be exterminated, and Chinese workers will be exploited to line the pockets of the Nouveau Aristocracy in God's kingdom.

Since the Communist Party have always insisted that Jesus is a member of the Chinese inferior race, which is an outrageous and utter insult.

So what are you going to do about it you worthless chink bastard?

The least attractive Third world nation to invade would be China due to the sheer size of its military, and therefore the cost borne by the Conquering nation doesn't seem to justify its immediate invasion in the short term. 

Consequently, China is probably the last Third world nation to be invaded, but there is no question that it will ultimately be invaded in accordance with the worldwide dominion of God's Kingdom that is clearly stated in Daniel 2 & 7.

And, also in accordance with the fact that "Death is the last enemy that will be defeated" in 1 Corinthians 15:26.

True or false?

Is it valid to compare electioneering with warfare?

After the Battle of Britain in 1940 Hitler turned his attention to invading Russia in Operation Barbarrossa in the following year.

However, it simply meant that the Nazi invasion of Britain was postponed until after the defeat of the USSR, but by no means should the postponement be misconstrued as an outright cancellation of Operation Sealion.

For Hitler had never intended to cancel the invasion of Britain, but only to postpone it until after his defeat of the USSR.

True or false?

It is a significant victory to force your enemy to quit their career by causing them to be permanently disabled.

True or false?

Because you have caused them to become disabled.

By killing as many workers as possible you can destroy the nation's wealth and economic growth.

True or false?