In Switzerland they require everyone have health insurance and those who receive subsidies have to repay them if they one day have the means. Is that stipulation going to be included in our system?
The Patriot
Favorite Answer
No. The reforms in the USA will offer government insurance to all who want it, but it will not be as good as that offered by private companies. It is not the same service but subsidised.
It surprises me that so many Americans seem not to be aware about Obama’s healthcare plans [a]. During the election, he campaigned for these changes stating that he felt it was unfair to have a system where insurance companies try to escape paying claims and was elected to bring in changes [b].
First of all, too many people do not know that Obama wants to make insurance more available to all. His system is similar to that which works in Holland, Taiwan [c] and Switzerland. It works there and private healthcare companies provide most the insurance to the people there.
FACT - the USA spends more on healthcare PER PERSON than any other nation on the planet [d].
FACT – insurance companies admit that they push up costs, buy politicians and do not pay out for many claims when they should [e].
FACT - the US has higher death rates for kids aged under five than western European countries with universal health coverage [f].
That means that a dead American four year old would have had a better chance of life if they were born in Canada, France, the Netherlands, Cuba, Switzerland, Germany, Japan etc, all of which have universal health coverage. And no western European nation with universal healthcare has moved away from it. And the sad thing is, that the insurance companies have spent loads of money to fight these reforms [g] and loads of politicians are taking the thirty pieces of silver from them to fight the reforms, rather than fight for the health of the American people.
Remember, I back my facts up with evidence. Those who say they are wrong tend not to. If they are wrong, e-mail me with proof and let me know.
?
actual, the assertion that it became Pelosi's suggestion is erroneous. It became a coaching of the background foundation and the Republicans lower back in 1993 with their option reform plan to Hillary's. whether he ought to are transforming into it surpassed without it, it could have doomed the act from the very beginning up. the main substantial motive force of wellbeing care fees as we communicate could be procuring the charges of the uninsured. without insisting that all people belong to the team, fees would not be unfold over adequate human beings to make it decrease priced. The Swiss figured this out 2 many years in the past and surpassed a plan with a mandate that's amazingly reminiscent of "Obamacare". it incredibly is working incredibly properly over there, yet they admitted from the beginning up that it may no longer be an choose-in plan and nonetheless contain fees.
Elle
Anything that will harm the health & freedoms of the people of America, will be found in the death care .... I mean .... health care "plan." So, let me just bet ... um, say, a TRILLION dollars, that your question can be answered with a YES. Don't add any favors to the poor, though. It will be REPAY or be taken to a CONCENTRATION CAMP. Wow! Obama's really bringing on the "Change!" It's TIME to be SCARED, and it's TIME to FIGHT BACK!!! Let's go!
http://www.roguegovernment.com/Congress_Seeks_To_Authorize_%26_Legalize_FEMA_Camp_Facilities/14007/0/13/13/Y/M.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=my1XJ_NlH4Q soldier on swine flu vaccine, rfid tag
andy
No, then again most of the people that will get the subsidies most likely will never get out of this cycle.