Can you answer this hockey question about a bad hockey idea, and poke holes in it? (part 1)?
I am only asking this again, because it did not post yesterday.
In the world it seems that money can buy you almost anything. For the right price, you can even fly into space.
So here’s my questions: For $100,000, you as a fan could play 5 minutes of real NHL hockey. Obviously, you must know how to skate, and you would have to attend at least 3 team practices. In return, any team of your choice (depending on availability) must play you for at least 5 minutes in one game (not including playoffs or preseason). Your team could potentially earn up to $8,200,000, which they could use to bulk up their own roster, and it would NOT be calculated into the Cap or CBA. Of course, the most desirable teams will most likely have a “guest” player every night with means more money, but teams that are less desirable like Atlanta, will probably benefit from the increased stats from the lack of a “guest” player. As a fan, it would be exciting if your team’s “guest” player was actually good, and it would also be entertaining if the opposing team’s “guest” player were awful.
1) Love the idea or hate the idea?
2) What are the biggest flaws with this idea?
Disclaimer: If you do not know me, I would never really want to see the game changed, and this question is solely for research purposes.