Is the news media telling us that they have nothing bad on Cain from this century?

What all this recent fascination with the 1990's?
Who was president back then anyway?
Are we going to relive the 1990's stories about improprieties in the White House?

2011-11-01T18:57:51Z

I made no mistake saying this century. I should not need to explain this but we are in the 21st century now.

2011-11-01T19:06:35Z

Note: I don't like people being treated unfairly. It does not matter whether i agree or disagree with the person being treated unfairly. That goes for Cain, Obama and anyone else.

Anonymous2011-11-01T18:55:03Z

Favorite Answer

Millenium*

Last True Paladin of Scotland2011-11-02T01:53:53Z

Bwahahaha...

XD

Okay I'm done, I think you mean decade, century is 100 years, you might as well have put eon, would have made as much sense.

Serious answer: I remember certain smears against Obama concerning his past association, these mostly happened far in the past. In other words, don't throw stones at glass houses.

Century is a 100 years, Cain isn't 100, therefore your point is wrong. No surprise there.

That doesn't matter your point is hyperbole, therefore you can't be taken seriously, if you want to be seen as serious, rely on facts.

Dreaded Rear Admiral2011-11-02T01:53:22Z

Funny how those gals got paid enough to keep their mouths shut for this long.

They must not have been indignant enough to refuse any settlement and expose Cain (if there was even anything legit in the charges) in order to stand up against injustice against other women.

I guess dignity has a price.

Anonymous2011-11-02T01:55:02Z

He offers them nothing from his dark side, so any accusation will get maximum play.

ingsoc12011-11-02T01:53:25Z

sure 999 is the dumbest tax plan since ross perot

Show more answers (1)