Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is Laura Bush or Hilllary Clinton more "anal"?
Got your attention now? Solid. Let me pull on your coat about something.
Most folks around here talk a lot of s**t about "repulicunts" and "libtards," which makes them sound pretty much the same. But is there a real difference between these 2 sides. I say yes, and I think I can prove it.
First, make a quick Top 3 of liberal or conservative values. Then choose a liberal or conservative leader. Got it? Here's where the magic begins.
For each little set-up you've created, ask the following: What happens if the leader fails to live up to the values?
Conservative values:
-Strong national defense
-Limited government
-Business men > academics
-Traditional societal values
Pin-up boy: GW Bush.
Okay, Bush is pretty traditional. But he was a crappy business man, his government has ballooned in size and power, and he's mixed bag at best on national defense (pro-military, but not exactly exemplary service record, and pretty bad job as CinC).
Do conservatives care? Nope. They LOVE W!
Now let's look at the liberal side.Pick your values, pick your guy, and ask the question. Holy crap! Half of the people love this guy, half think he's irrelevant, half hate him. Look at Clinton (either Bill or Hillary). There's no kind of unity behind either one on the left.
Look at Lieberman. When he ignored liberal principles, he got nailed for it.
Look at how "maverick" John McCain ended up smooching Bush's byootocks during the campaign.
The difference that I see is that conservatives will stick with their leaders, regardless of the leader's integrity or commitment to values. This is great at election time, because liberals will usually only stick with a candidate so long as he or she has the same values. Principle is much more important in the equation than personality for liberals.
Holla back.
10 Answers
- Lonnie PLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
To answer your original question, Hillary is far and away more anal and annoying than Laura; and not as cute, either.
To answer your second: we have no real leaders. Only people interested in power on both sides of the aisle. Anyone who tells you different is lying through their tooth.
- 1 decade ago
I have to wonder which gal prefers it that way and why. Then we will know the definitive answer. So far, I can only guess. Must be Laura. Her man is the very definition of azzhole......but I do have to admit Bill wasn't much better. He just didn't crap on as many people as Dub, he stuck with the women he could find.
- 1 decade ago
Have we ever met Rumsfeld's wife? Cheney's wife seems pretty anal, too. Laura Bush is just along for the ride.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
Thundertheighs Clinton, of course. That's a **** only a mother could love. Yuck!
- 1 decade ago
I think it all depends on who is standing behind them as to how anal they each are.
Laura bush wouldn't b anal at all as george w. wouldn't be there
because he usually has tony blair standing behind him & john howard standing front of him ( GWB).
Source(s): A little bird told me - brewbeer212Lv 41 decade ago
I think they're both anal....then again we all are. no wonder this planet smells like a**.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I don't know and I don't care about their sexual lives
- Anonymous1 decade ago
you are.
