Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Zhimbo
Lv 4
Zhimbo asked in Science & MathematicsBiology · 1 decade ago

Creationist Fossil Challenge: Which of these are apes? Which are human?

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.h...

At this link there is a picture of 14 skulls...1 is a modern ape, 1 is a modern human skull. What are the other skulls - ape, or human? How do you draw the line?

Update:

By "Creationist Fossil Challenge", I mean a challenge TO creationists, not FROM a creationist...

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    The talkorigins site is great ... but I really wish they did not put the modern chimp skull at one end of the photo. To start with, a modern chimp skull is out of place with all the other photos in chronological order. It just fuels the misunderstanding by people who don't understand evolution, that humans evolved from chimps ... which is totally false.

    But a bigger problem with this photo is that it makes the old mistake of showing stages, one next to the other, as if evolution was just one long progressive chain of one species changing into the next. That is one of the biggest mistakes in the explanation of evolution. It is one of the biggest misunderstandings about how evolution works.

    Life is a *tree*, not a chain. Each of the skulls in this photo represent a species that was a *branch* on that tree ... not a 'stage'. It's photos like this that leads people to ask about "missing links", or "if X evolved into humans, why didn't *all* X's evolve into humans (or why are there still X's around)?"

    I've seen so many people finally understand that one simple point ... that evolution is a constantly branching *tree*, not a chain ... and the lightbulb just lights up over their head and they go "Ah! Now I understand evolution!"

    Source(s): Example of a tree diagram: http://www.scientific-art.com/portfolio%20palaeont...
  • 1 decade ago

    the other skulls are neither modern ape nor modern man. They are our precursors. Evolution doesn't state that man came from apes, it states that at some point long ago, we shared a common ancestor.

    Skulls are more complex than they seem. They are separated into many different regions, come in different sizes w/ different sized brain cases, etc. These are some of the features that causes them to be classified as different species.

    Based on where the skulls were found, researchers can determine an approximate age of the skulls. When you line them up in order of age, you can see a progression of features towards modern man.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    maximum of them are not finished adequate for me (as a non-bone guy) to tell the version. i'm useful an expert could supply a greater powerful answer, yet for those the place there is adequate bone mass to tell: A=ape B=ape C=ape D=ape H=ape I=ape J=ape L is tough to tell, because of the fact i'm uncertain if the discollored sections are filled in or of those are actual area of the bone mass. M and N are the two human, and if I (as a non-bone guy) have been to wager, i could wager that N is an Asiatic and M is African.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Evolution...Yeah!!

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • rand a
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    maybe one is george w's, he could be the missing link

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.