Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

An old question for theists reframed in a way that you can't evade: test your might!?

A criticism of the Big Bang is that it, since the universe came from nothingness before the Big Bang how can something come from nothingness? God must have done it.

But where did God come from? A response is that he exists out of time, however, time is not a spatial location but rather a dimension of our universe, so it's impossible for anything to exist outside of it, even things existing in lower or higher dimensions.

Anyway, to the point: It may be hard to explain how the universe originating from the Big Bang came from nothing, even though this new universe is a very *simple* burst of energy and matter, but isn't it harder to explain how God, who is intelligent and almighty and thus extremely *complex* came from nothing? Isn't it more rediculous to assume that out of an explosion comes a bunch of chaotic junk rather than the Statue of Liberty, or out of a pile of metal just slag rather than a '76 Chevy? Please respond without reference to scripture, instead using your own logic.

Update:

I would have liked to explain my position further, but I was constrained by the character limit: lets take it for granted that God exists. Now, the universe as commonly defined is everything, so that must mean the universe contains both us and God ( you can believe God *is* the universe, but that doesn't change the argument) Then, either the universe always existed, or it at one point didn't exist and then later, came into being. The universe as science says it is is the result of an initial impulse (the great explosion) whereas theism says that from the not-being came the 'statue of liberty' (a complex and intelligent structure) and from that came an explosion. While both are difficult to comprehend, the second is clearly *more* difficult to comprehend and is subject to Occam's razor. My argument is essentially a deconstruction of the 'unmoved mover' justification of theism and I'm asking for counter-arguments keeping what I have said in mind.

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Alright first off the Bible never states a beginning to the universe only a beginning to the earth. What came before this is for us just to wonder and ask God one day in Heaven. However the Bible does state that God always was... And the biggest criticism of the Big Bang now a days is that The earth is in such a critical position for life. There is a very minuscule Chance that out of luck the earth could have landed where it did.

    Ok now to the question you are truly asking. Where did God begin? If God created the concept of time then before he didso the universe had no time. So before time there was no beginning of anything. Everything was as it was. Think of it like outer space. In Space there is no way to say where it begins and where it ends? Why? because there would be nothing there, which would be more space. So God always was because eternity goes both ways.

  • 1 decade ago

    "Isn't it more rediculous to assume that out of an explosion comes a bunch of chaotic junk rather than the Statue of Liberty, or out of a pile of metal just slag rather than a '76 Chevy?"

    Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but are you suggesting that it's actually more logical tot hink the Statue of Liberty could come from an explosion instead of chaotic junk? I think it's totally ridiculous to think an orderly universe could come from a big bang, without some kind of Creator.

    You said it's impossible for anything to exist outside of time; how can you know that? What is time anyway? Just because you can't grasp the idea of existing outside of time, that doesn't prove God can't do it.

    About the big bang, I'm not sure I have to believe there was a big bang to believe in God. Have scientists decided there was no big bang?

    Some scientists do believe there are more dimensions than what we can experience; I don't know how they prove it, but I am inclined to believe they are right.

  • Marty
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    If there was a big bang in nothingness, in order to have any a formation , it would have to result from small particles rushing toward one point to form a mass, and the mass would still be growing; there would be evidence. This would be the result of an implosion.

    An explosion on the other hand would cause all particles to move away from the location in a straight line. "Scientists" claim that our universe is expanding, and I will give them that point, but it is expanding in a spiral motion. Where did the force come from that caused the change in motion? If there was nothing, where did the massive bodies come from that might contribute a gravitational pull? It just can't happen. Caos can never change to order without something or someone greater to change the course.

    If after the exploseion, the possibility of human life occuring is 1X 10 to the 40000 power. That is just for human life, if you also include the possibilities for the formation of this planet coming from a cosmic explosion, the odds are much greater. Then you also have to factor in the odds of our sun, and our atmosphere, and everything necessary for us to survive. It is an impossibility.

    Now look at the odds of this universe, the earth and human life being created by a God 50-50.

  • 1 decade ago

    Well the universe is made up of science and math really and there is a formula for every thing we know of, see, feel, touch, breathe, and even those things we do not see or feel, including dimensions which are created. Thus the 3-dimension, 2 dimension references we hear about. However, since time is also a created dimension, wouldn't it make sense that the Creator whom we know and call God of all that, lives outside of any dimension so He can create and control the dimensions that exist?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    13.seventy 3 billion years. I consider the determine by using fact it truly is probable the wonderful answer technological know-how has so some distance arise with. i'm undecided why you think of being a theist or no longer makes any difference to that.

  • 1 decade ago

    Christians do not believe that God was created, nor do we believe that he came from nothing. We believe that he was before all things, that everything was created by Him and that everything is from Him. So...... I cannot logically explain how God could come from nothing because I do not believe that there was ever a point in time where there was no God. Cannot attempt to logic my way through something I do not believe.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    SIMPLE LOGIC !!

    Premise 1. Outputs = Inputs + process

    Premise 2. For premise 1 to come about someone has to have the resources and power to do the process. Let him be called the Great Cause.

    Premise 3. For every rule there is an exception.

    Premise 4. The rule on exception can not be applied to any of the components on Premise 1 because it would be non-sense.

    Premise 5. The rule on exception must therefore be applied to premise 2.

    Conclusion: Therefore, the Great Cause ( the one w/ resources and sufficient might) was the one who caused Premise 1. Further He was not subject to Premise 1 by reason of premise 3.

    Source(s): Logic 101
  • MONK
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Ok, how about this?:

    God spontaneously created himself. He is spirit not matter. His created matter through his will. He created all of the laws of the universe. He existed before the big bang and caused the big bang.

    You are asking to hear dogma. I'm an agnostic theist. I'll freely admit to guessing. My answer makes as much sense as "God is eternal". Why couldn't someone just say "matter is eternal". (I suppose they could)

  • 1 decade ago

    So what your saying is that your theory makes more sense because it doesn't involve God? That's all I got out of that mumbo-jumbo.

  • 1 decade ago

    Glad you wrote this in a way that we can't evade! Sorry what is your question in all this commentary?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.