Which would look better on a grad school application?

You are correct to think that the Denmark program would give the impression that you are not focused. The courses also sound a bit "fluffy," which is never good to have on one's transcript. If I were looking at a transcript with the Denmark courses, I would conclude that the student studied abroad for fun, not for serious academic reasons.

The postcolonial lit courses, wherever you take them, would be beneficial if you apply to an English grad program.

If you apply to a history and philosophy of science program, the postcolonial lit courses would not be a good addition to your application.

Are you going to get a level from a distant places college? Or are you going to take an replace software? they're 2 completely countless issues, and the outcomes, while regarded at with the aid of potential graduate faculties could be different. although, i think of that the two way, if this technique is "surprising", then any grad faculties might decide for to work out it. As for an replace software, they often look kindly upon that, as properly.

Denmark will look just fine on your resume. You are there to study. Australia is a close second. Some people think South Africa means low standards, so avoid it.

Go to which ever one stretches you most.

my advice

South Africa

Australia

Denmark