Do you believe that Emotion is the enemy of Reason?

No, and it's not the cause of violence. You are suppose to express yourself. That is what is wrong with this world today. People are stuck in the 3rd dimension suppressing their "true feelings". I just read that the Anglo Saxon are conditioned to control their feelings because it's not "appropriate". People need to bring back their "younger self".......

The soul also partakes of volition, which means the reasoning faculty expands in relation to the expanding quantity of judgements of an object's value. Note that "object" is an impoverished term for what has been under scrutiny for centuries by sages, none of whom have been able to easily clarify to others what they may understand perfectly. The problem of language coexists with the problem of choosing "the better over the worse" course of action just as an individual's solitary thoughts/emotions coexist with the minimal requirements of social order, ius naturale.

When an individual meets the "minimal requirement", ie., understands the necessity (this not identical to simply following commands) to subjugate chaotic impulses, the reasoning faculty becomes the cause it formerly sought to understand. Not incidentally, this is where the difference between human and animal nature can be found. Individual humans may reach a state of Being beyond the supposed unintelligible origin of a command, but not before first passing through the intelligible nature of an (animal) impulse.

The elimination of emotions *would* lead to a more peaceful existence, but it would also be purposeless. All care for others would be replaced with extreme apathy. As a result, would humanity would be discouraged from communication? On the other hand, if reason was eradicated, the world would erupt into mass chaos.

I believe that emotions and reason work hand in hand to make the world the way it is today.

I do agree that emotion clouds judgement but does not always lead to violence there is a limit that a human can control emotion in a situation but once the emotion gets out of that grip that is when you can call it violence. Like dogs they are good and lovable but when they get into a state of mind they are hard to reason with

The elimination of emotion would likely reduce violence and other "bad behavior", but we may as well be dead. There would be no passion, no love, no joy, etc.

No, Emotion is not the enemy of Reason. Emotion and Reason must work together to create the rational world we live in. Emotions give us purpose to live, such as love. Reason keeps us grounded in the real world, so we can still live. :)

sometime in life you will comprehend, each little thing in life thats authentic is all approximately thoughts. people are distinctive from robots. We do have thoughts, thats how we fairly sense non violent. each human is born as a susceptible, gentle and harmless creature. for occasion, did you ever see little ones enjoying complicated? no? lol. yet i will assert the worldwide is circularly ****** up. As we improve, we've been given harm, that's why we build particular varieties in our lives to guard ourselves. maximum folk refer it to impassive life. yet enable me inform you we in uncomplicated terms use at optimal 10% of our recommendations, something of our habit comes from our subconscious recommendations. it rather is completely impossible for people to be impassive. maximum folk will attempt to be very logical as their protection mechanism and reported i'm no longer emotional. this could be a lie, tell them to fairly look deep interior, they do have thoughts, they only won't admit it. It take a lot of braveness to handle those thoughts, it rather is a controversy of taking conceivable. thoughts brought about violences, yet is it authentic we are able to sense non violent in a worldwide with out emotions? impassive is inhuman. interior the society, we do ought to guard ourselves by ability of retaining our thoughts returned, that's how etiquette and ethical are shaped. it rather is reliable in a manner, so we've been given much less fairly fights interior the society. despite the fact that, we've a tendency to forget with regard to the flexibility. I propose there are situations we ought to continuously be susceptible. in any different case, we does no longer be waiting to get carry of authentic love and happiness. some people will say that's naive. it rather is not any longer. Naive is doing something with out understanding what it rather is for. thoughts make us improve up as a human. while somebody desperate to isolate their thoughts off from the worldwide, it rather is loss of life for their develop. Being previous is in basic terms organic yet to enhance, its a decision. there is not any element of life while thoughts does no longer exist. it rather is a ineffective worldwide. Peace would in no way exist in such worldwide interior the 1st place. Ah this word by surprise arise in my recommendations. impassive itself is emotion. it rather is the hatred for emotion and hatred is one in each of those emotion. desire that helps.