creationists. why do biologists strongly believe in evolution?

I can respond to Aviator's comment. The reason scientists don't get grant money is because there isn't any grant money anymore (;-P). If someone had an interesting example of an exception to the theory, they would become extremely famous and successful biologists (publish in Nature, etc). The reason such examples haven't been published is because they haven't been found.

I'd like to answer Brother Michael's answer...

It was a majority of uneducated people that once thought the earth was flat, in contradiction to what the scientists thought... as is currently the case... A majority of scientifically illiterate people think creation is plausible...

Nowadays, believe it of not, doctors use maggots to treat infection, since they eat dead tissue only and leave live, healthy tissue alone...

And "biogenesis" isn't a "law." Maybe your christian website claims it is, but it isn't.

Experts in the field of biology all agree,... creationism isn't science at all. Evolution is a fact.

You want to believe in the sky-fairy, go right ahead,... but if you want real scientific knowledge, you're not going to find it in the bible.

I would not say biologists BELIEVE in evolution, they just see enough evidence to accept the evolution as a fact :)

I am not a creationist. But I have seen the argument that scientists go with evolution because it allows them to get grant money. So if they didn't accept evolution, they wouldn't get funding. There might also be an argument that the liberal colleges brainwash them.

Of course, 99% of the work in the field of biology is based on evolution. So in a way, they are right. If you don't accept evolution you won't get grant money, since you will be unable to perform basic biology.

So, a majority makes something true, right? At one time, a majority of the people believed the sun revolved around the earth, they were wrong.

There was a time when the majority of people believed the world was flat, they were wrong.

There was a time when a majority of people, doctors and scientists included, who believed blood letting was an acceptable medical procedure, they were wrong.

It is called group think. If a scientist wants tenure in the university system, wants their papers published, wants good jobs, they align with the secular, humanist group think. The truth is, evolution violates one of the few known laws of biology, the law of biogenesis as explained here:

(1) "There is one well-known law of life: the law of biogenesis. This law states simply that life always comes from life. This is what observational science tells us: organisms reproduce other organisms after their own kind. Historically, Louis Pasteur disproved one alleged case of spontaneous generation; he showed that life comes from previous life. Since then, we have seen that this law is universal—with no known exceptions. This is, of course, exactly what we would expect from the Bible. According to Genesis 1, God supernaturally created the first diverse kinds of life on earth and made them to reproduce after their kind. Notice that molecules-to-man evolution violates the law of biogenesis. Evolutionists believe that life (at least once) spontaneously formed from nonliving chemicals. But this is inconsistent with the law of biogenesis. Real science confirms the Bible."

God,s word tell,s of before the end of time that Satan will

blind the eye,s of many,he say,s narrow is the way to Heaven and few there be that find it,and wide is the gate to Hell

and many be that find it,so denying God,s word and saying

he did not creat it all like he said is being blind.

Scientist also believed that the Earth was the center of the universe for thousands of years. Just because the scientists believe something does not make it correct, it just means they have an idea with the data they have collected and it might form an incomplete picture.

You can believe in both evolution and God.

Because Atheist mix materialism to deny God via evolution