Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
3 Answers
- iansandLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
Adequately, at least in naval terms. Better ships sailed by better seamen. The tactic of harrying the Armada so it kept moving downwind was a good one.
However, had the Armada got a bridgehead and the Spanish troops in Holland got across things would have been distinctly dicey as the army was not too good.
- liorio1Lv 41 decade ago
It wasn't that well prepared at all. Safe to say that the British navy gave a good account of itself in a skirmish, because its ships were much smaller, faster and more maneuverable than the Spanish galleons. However, the real victor was the great storm off the southern coast of England, which wreaked more than a third of the Spanish fleet and severely damaged the remainder so it was no longer considered viable to fight the British fleet, much less attempt a landing.
- gentlerogerLv 61 decade ago
They weren't. The British fleet was created quickly (which helped it win because the style of its cannon were more modern and effective) to respond to the crisis. In terms of land forces, England relied on local militias. By the time the English could had marshaled a land force to rival Spain's invading army, the Spanish would be drinking port in the Tower of London.