Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
VP Predictions???
I'm an Obama guy, so I can't make informed speculations for the other candidates. I'm thinking that if he wins the nomination, some female Hillary supporters might get a little disenchanted. Rather than risk losing their support in November, he should ask the democratic governor of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius, to be his VP. She's cool, smart, a female, and from a traditionally red state. If the dems can capture Kansas in the general election, the the electoral college probably tips in their favor.
Who do you guys predict the Veeps will be for Obama, Clinton, or McCain?
3 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
The Obama camp has wisely not leaked any VP choices so it is all speculation.
Edwards has to be on the list, but I think him not endorsing Obama last week probably took him off the list. Edwards hedged his bets too long, IMO. I don't think he would be that great of a choice as he gets lost behind the fact that he is too rich for the poor to openly embrace and too pro-poor for the rich and middle class. He is also from a state too far north to be "really" southern and too far south to be northern. NC has 15 electoral votes and went red last time despite his presence on the ticket. A good presidential candidate for 2012 or 2016, but not a VP candidate today.
Dem insiders seem to like Kathleen Sebelius to placate the Hillary supporters and deliver solid excutive experience in a hot name. That would be a solid ticket. She is very popular in 2004 red state Kansas and could deliver it, but that is only 6 electoral votes. I have seen her speak on TV and although she is solid and heartfelt, her stump speaking is nothing to write home about. She is a solid governor, but really made her name by kicking the insurance companies' asses.
Gen. Wesley Clark has been a longtime favorite of mine who addresses a lot of Obama's weaknesses. As former head of NATO, Clark would give him a military, security, and foreign policy advisor (sorely needed) and a military, security, and foreign policy attack dog against McCain (if needed). Clark is very progressive, he is very smart, and his resume is clean. Clark has big time credibility in Europe and, with bridge-maker Obama, would instantly repair America's tattered international reputation.
Former Marine Jim Webb would be a great choice for many of the same reasons. While Clark is a intellectual crowd guy, Webb is a hardnosed everyman. He is anti-iraq with a military background and is a straight and forceful talker. Webb just looks like he could break you in half. His speaking and debate skills are very plain, but top notch. Mainstream America gets him. He would be an excellent attack dog on the stumbling McCain. Frankly, if we lose, I could see Webb as the rising star for the Dems in 2012. He is a beast and Virginia has 13 electoral votes and went red last time. He could deliver virginia and maybe help deliver a few southern states.
I haven't seen General Zinni speak, so I don't know if he is up to the VP job, but his resume sounds OK, not great. I really don't know if it helps to partner anti-war from the start Obama with a guy who was a loud proponent of us going in. There seems to be whispers that suggest Zinni is on the list.
Janet Napolitano would be a VERY smart pick if the economy gets worse. She is a spendy liberal like Obama, but has been financially brilliant in Arizona at balancing the books without raising taxes and is someone who has her political and spending priorities straight. She is tough --- vetoing the Hell out of the Arizona republican led legislature. Additionally, she was Anita Hill's attourney. That sends the right kind of supreme court messages out that should really motivate the Hillary crowd. She is widely respected as one of the better governors and has a first hand take on the border issue. She is pretty damned salty as VP candidates go, IMO. Sadly, I don't know that she could swing Arizona's 10 electoral votes to Obama with McCain in the race. From an election standpoint there may be better candidates; From doing the VP job standpoint, she is up there with Clark.
Joe Biden is a sharp tongued foreign Policy expert who I adore, but he does have a way of bungling campaigns by his love of his own voice. I doubt Biden could accidentally sink Obama if he screwed up--- Obama is too teflon. Biden seems to get along great with Obama and does strongly give off a presidential vibe in debates (not an insignificant point when people watch the VP debates to see if the VP seems competent). VP's often act as attack dogs on the opposing Presidential candidate. Biden would be a great weapon against the Republican candidate. He singlehandedly destroyed Rudy Guiliani. Biden is from a small state but does have his own fan base nationwide. Voters who know foreign policy know Biden, but he doesn't give the military bump with the security crowd that clark would and won't give you a red state like some of the others can. IMO the short list for Secretary of State should start with Joe Biden and end with Governor Richardson.
NM Governor Richardson would be a very solid pick for VP. He has a well publicized and well respected resume. He is a great negotiator, but sadly an even bigger ego. He seems to read his press clippings and actually defended attourney general Gonzales on the grounds that he was hispanic too. That pandering lack of judgement might come into play turning off a lot of voters who would otherwise consider minority candidates. With Obama's aloofness, it could be risky adding an arrogant partner. I think a more individually approachable person would be good. In Richardson's favor, he would be one of the few VP candidates who could bring in extra votes that Obama would not get in big swing states Florida and Ohio. (Usually VPs don't generate many votes outside of their home state). This ticket would clean up the Hispanic vote.
I think his best ticket in terms of electoral count may actually be Obama/frmr FL Gov. Bob Graham ticket. Obama will not win the red leaning older florida with a republican governor without a lot of help. Graham is one of the few candidates who could deliver Florida. Graham may not look it, but is very, very clever. If you listen to him speak for a while you really appreciate how smart and insightful he is. Graham never lost an election in Florida and is a fan of bipartisanship to accomplish bigger goals. He could definitely give Obama Florida and would give them a real chance to win several southern states with a black man/good ol' boy 1-2 punch. (I felt as silly writing that last sentence as you felt reading it, but it is nonetheless true.)
Foreign policy and military strong McCain might take Huckabee. Don't think that helps him overall. Many evengelicals will never vote for McCain and many of McCain's Independent base would abandon him for Obama if they could potentially be putting the radical evangelical Huckabee in the whitehouse. McCain would be smart to court NY Mayor Bloomberg (financial wizard) as his VP. That could put NY and the northeast states into play and open a path to victory.
- sdn90036Lv 61 decade ago
Obama will chose Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico. Richardson can deliver the Hispanic vote. Also, he's very popular in New Mexico and could deliver New Mexico, which normally votes for the Republican candidates.
Clinton is good friends with Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico. I believe she would also chose him. I believe Clinton is out of the race. She tried the best that she could.
McCain: I have no idea who he's going to chose.
Good question.
- Alea SLv 71 decade ago
Obama: Edwards
Clinton: Edwards
McCain: (?) If he were smart he would choose a woman or a person of color as his running mate.