Does anyone think that Obama's wins are less Important than Hillary's ?

it would appear that the Clinton campaign thinks the smaller states are insignificant, and are willing to concede them

and by the way their are not enough blacks to elect anyone

they are only 13% of the population

I would say a win is a win, no matter whos voting for you...I read the black population in the U.S. is 13% so someone other than blacks are voting for him. I wonder how many people that voted for Mr Obama did so because they were voting against Hillary, thats not to take anything away from Mr Obama but reading some of the answers in here concerning Hillary Id hafta think shes not the peoples favorite person and I wonder if those that were voting against Hillary will vote for McMain in the general election...it makes for some interesting questions.

I was thinking pretty much the same thing the other day, I live in a "small" state and feel like she thinks we are insignificant here. She claims that the big states i.e. Ohio, California, Texas etc. are needed to win the election, maybe, but what makes her so SURE Obama wont carry them if she looses the nomination? It is because of the way she thinks that I will not vote for her. I agree the media should be all over this.

He wins the caucuses, which are faulty and archaic. Hillary is quite right in saying she will not accept a caucus in FL. If the DNC opts to throw out the primary results and schedule caucuses this spring, Obama would probably emerge the victor, since this form of voting is riddled with pitfalls. In addition to its more primitive "raise your hand" form of vote tabulation, it often requires traveling long distances, untrained volunteers sorting out the logistics (if they show up at all), and then attending a meeting that lasts one or three hours. Such factors tend to deter Clinton's base: older voters; wage earners who work during the hours of the caucus: voters who need childcare, don't own a car or have other obligations; immigrants and those for whom English is a second language.

How is this a fair election, then? Winning the primaries is more important to me than caucuses.

Yes. Unfortunately, Clinton followers "conveniently" think that way. It is an underhanded tactic to try to sway those multi-mentioned "super delegates" their way.

THE ONLY REASON WHY Clinton has won the "bigger" states, is BECAUSE THEY ARE FILLED WITH HISPANIC PEOPLE, and the majority of this group will vote against an African-American candidate, for fear of being ostracized by a black president. IF THE "BIG STATES" weren't filled with Hispanics, most of them would have been won by Obama (California and Texas, the biggest two, for sure).

Hillary is just trying to win. She knows she's lost the Black vote, and is trying to minimize his 100+ delegate lead as much as possible.

Apparently Hillary and her supporters.

No, and that's a pretty bigoted statement. They're not less important. He has more delegates and more votes. That's what counts.

That is a good question - "Present"