Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Ladies: Do you like my idea on advancing the cause of equality...?

Female athletes should be allowed to use anabolic steroids & human Growth Hormone (in supraphysiologic levels and under the strict supervision of a physician) in an effort to attain the requisite size and lean muscle mass, thereby obviating any naturally occuring differences in body habitus, specifically with respect to any musculoskeletal disparity which might otherwise be used as an exclusionary criterion.

This way women can perform at the same levels are NCAA & professional American football players, and any other major league sports.

Update:

Douchey... good point, I mean clearly B. Urlacher presses, what 600-700 easily, so my idea is to introduce strategic endocinologic techniques to eliminate the dimorphism which exists, specifically under the direction of an endocrinologist, and this should all take place in the peri-pubescent period, and as such, there is no reason, biologically speaking, that the female cannot assume the same muskuloskeletal structure of a conventional middle linebacker.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Dee
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    No, I think your idea is really disgusting.

    Amazon chicks who take male hormones so they can grow muscles and look like guys are the most repulsive and fugly creatures on earth.

    I prefer my plan for athletic competition:

    Forbid the use of all hormones and steroids and etc. to both men and women. Do rigorous testing or even outlaw the substances so nobody can cheat. That way the men will naturally be much bigger, stronger, tougher and more powerful than the women.

    Then do away with segregation in sports. Make the women compete against the men, and watch them get totally clobbered. The big, strong, powerful, masculine men would totally wipe up the floor with the women, they would not stand a chance against real men. It would be obvious just how very weak and helpless and wussy women really are, compared to men.

    Now THAT would be a joy to watch. Especially in sports like boxing and wrestling and mixed martial arts. Let's get some radical feminists in there to duke it out with the top male boxers, yes! They would be instant pudding.

    And maybe that's what it would take for these gals to finally get it through their silly heads that there are real and natural and important differences between men and women; and that a mere woman does not stand a chance against a real man, in any kind of genuine athletic competition.

    There is a reason why men have dominated virtually every culture and society since the dawn of time, and that reason has to do with being naturally equipped for dominating women. What women need to do is start admitting and appreciating that fact, and then they will even start to enjoy it.

    Because women are naturally submissive, just as men are naturally dominant. And when men put women firmly in their place, then the women soon find that they can actually *enjoy* admiring a strong man, worshipping his powerful biceps and his phallus. And thus the harmony of the sexes will return.

    (And: I'm a woman.)

    ADD: To the person who posted below: I don't relish the idea of a woman getting physically destroyed by a man -- only thoroughly defeated and humbled. No permanent injuries, except perhaps to the overbloated egos of the silly feminists. That would be a healthy thing, see?

    Personally, I find it very erotic to see a small, fragile woman get wrestled and overpowered by a big, strong, powerfully muscled man, and see her made to totally submit to his domination, and be made to worship him and his strong sexy body, and his gorgeous muscles. Especially if he follows that up with aggressively dominating and ravishing her, to the mutual sexual bliss of both of them. (Maybe even sit on her face, if she's lucky. Or rub his biceps in her face, and force her to kiss them.) Now that is truly sexy. I would love to see more of this type of romantic love in the movies, but it's hard to find these days. For that I blame the feminists. But it's hardly the only thing I blame them for.

    .

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha that is hilarious. You really are a bit of a dark horse eh =D

    umm to be honest have you seen the size of some of the linebackers.. I dunno about you but when was the last time you saw a 6'10" woman, let alone 350lb of muscle

    Sexual dimorphism won't allow them to get an adequate frame size to compete fairly against those men.

    Edit: sounds good, but what if they don't want to be American Football players once they pass puberty? You're assuming they'll want to be, but once this procedure has taken place they'll pretty much be eliminated from certain career paths they could have had. Men can't help it if we're born to play this sport but genetically engineering women to do so sounds a bit OTT considering like I say they can't just revert back.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Is this pseudo-scientific fanatics club open to all?

    If you still can't struggle over the mental obstacle of women vs men in sport as a measure of equality, you don't deserve proper answers.

    That idiot above me relishing the physical destruction of women in sport might consider an hour of chopping wood before breakfast to let off accumulated tensions. Don't let the mistaken notions of radical feminists or hyper-masculists colour how you see reality: step away from schoolyard arguments about who can beat who at football and concern yourself with real issues.

    btw, aren't you the alleged radiologist? More doctors get corrupted as the years pass, that's my experience anyway.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    well it wouldn't take all that.......simply have her loose weight under 10% to stop the estrogen and reproductive system and up her testosterone levels. After a few years she will be good to go.

    Depending upon the age you start this...it could work. Only issue left over is female ligaments, aren't made to hold "mass" muscle or be over strained. A lot of young women have problems with there knees and such from athletics.

    .....not a serious suggestion...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Dan A
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    ah but your forgetting the thought of hitting a woman with the force some sports use will cause alot of men to hesitate thereby ruining the game (you know the i can never hit a woman thing let alone ram her to the ground)

    Also if any accidents were to occur due to the fact that she is a woman playing with men people will be getting sued blind

  • 1 decade ago

    Sure! If it is also OK for me to have skeletal mass deconstructive surgery, radical cosmetic realignment and a whole dose of hormonal implants so I can enter the woman's gymnastics team. (Or at least their change rooms!) : )

    Source(s): I reckon Dee's point of view is so far the most rational. Except that instead of banning any surgical, chemical or psychologicall attempts to highlight the natural genetic disparity between men and woman, WE should allow all science equally to determin which sex is "superior" at sports. If the gals need medicine to compete, so will the fellas. I'd personally love to see a pumped up Herculanean Behemoth smash an Amazon to pieces! : ) Also, is it possible to enter a fair dinkum debate in YA without losing points? I'm still level 1 and can't vote.
  • 1 decade ago

    Forget it. If they can't achieve the proper physicality without drugs (hear that, Mr. Bonds?), they shouldn't expect to go far in sports.

  • 1 decade ago

    Your dog needs to diet.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.