Will this make a strong statement to the superdelegates foin their decision to select their Democtrat nominee?

He's still way better than Hillary, and the superdelegates know it.

Besides, if they go against the will of the voters, they'll lose the general election anyway.

Obama is only associated with Farrakhan and "anti America racist groups" in your dreams, my friend.

Sotomayor has a ton of judicial journey, is rated as a reasonable, and has been appointed to judicial positions by way of Republicans and Democrats. What i do in contrast to, is now that the Republicans have not got a Filibuster (have not got 40-one Senators) Obama could placed forth a Liberal, ideally somebody who writes nicely and is gorgeous, by using fact they are going to be writing distinctive dissenting evaluations. playstation . we don't continuously get the "superb" candidate. Do you quite think of Roberts merits to be the remarkable court docket chief Justice? Scalia or Thomas could have been moved over, if Bush have been searching for the "superb" candidate. All everyone does is %. a certified candidate that has reviews that lead them to an exciting candidate.

Howard Dean says the superdelegates shouldn't blindly go by the pledged delegate count but support the candidate most likely to win. Clearly, they need to consider whether this sticks.

You should watch the latest news media response. Even Mike Huckabee is on Obama's side and defended him, against Rev. Wright. Nobody believes that Obama is Wright or vice reversa.

I have been for Obama since the beginning and I know that the media has manipulated the people's views of Obama. Having said that...I want the party to win...so I am looking at Hillary more closely. She has many of the same ideas as Obama...

It's becoming clear that Clinton is the only chance the dems have against McCain

Obama is probably unelectable at this point

Not if they want to retain their seats in the government in the next election.

It sure as hell ought to make them think hard before they choose.