Credible arguments, not including the watch argument, for ID (ID advocates only)?

Here is a brief overview of the scientific case for ID: http://www.arn.org/docs/positivecasefordesign.pdf

And for those who put so much faith in peer-review, check this out: http://www.discovery.org/a/2640

Actually, if you look back through history, it's easy to see that using "scientific proof" alone as a standard is apt to make your results inaccurate. The reason is, scientific proof is based solely on our knowledge at the time the "proof" is accepted. Jonah in the belly of a whale (the biggest "fish" known)? Impossible! Jonah in the belly of the gigantic marine creature whose fossil was recently found, and which could swallow the largest whale whole? A different story. Plus, if you don't want to believe something, all the "proof" in the world won't change your mind. God bless.

When you look at the constants of our universe and understand that we do not completely understand what is governing,causing,or controlling these forces....gravity is a great example of this....plus if you look at mathematics as a universal laguage that is demonstrates that is can be applied anywhere in the universe and be the exact same, whether it be here on earth or 100 billion light years away math works, always.

Then it is left to the individual to decide it this universe of ours seems to have 'just happened' or was it 'designed'....

If the Earth was any closer or further away from the sun, life on Earth would be impossible