Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Mikira
Lv 5
Mikira asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 1 decade ago

What exactly do you think the government should do inregards to Anthropogenic Global Warming?

No, I've not changed my mind. I'm just curious on what you think the government could do that the private sector isn't already doing.

Update:

Benjamin - That is an incredible list of ideas!

The only one I disagree with is:

"Taxes or carbon charges on fossil fuels"

I feel the government wastes tax dollars as it is, so to give them an idea to take even more taxes I'm completely against.

"Improved crop and grazing land management to increase soil carbon storage." - Wouldn't this be something farmers should be implementing themselves? So how would the government implement something like this?

"Restoration of degraded lands; reforestation; forest management; reduced deforestation." - I love this one!!

Update 2:

QCNP58 - How do you think we could do this? "Enhance natural carbon sinks."

This was something I was thinking about myself that's why I asked some questions in regards to cultivating things that absorb CO2.

Update 3:

hebe00 - Do you really want that much government control of your daily life? What would you think if they did that and than we find out that CO2 really isn't the culbrit after all? Or that we (I meant the world with this we) do lower our CO2 emissions to next to nil and the CO2 in our atmosphere still continues to increase?

Update 4:

Dana - I need to do more research on Cap and trade. I feel I should know more about what that is, since the guy I had lived with for fifteen years talked about it, since he watched alot of finacial programs.

Update 5:

James - You've mentioned "solar power stations in orbit" before and I'm trying to wrap my mind around the concept. Part of my problem is if these solar power stations are in space, how do we get the energy to the consumer?

I know how a satelite television gets it's signal. I understand how radios get their signal and how the signal on a celular phone works, but wouldn't we need more than a signal to get the energy we are collecting from the sun to people on the planet?

Update 6:

Hannah's Grandpa - Great ideas! I especially love this idea: "Build bike lanes along major highways." - If I had something like that right now, I'd be able to ride a bike to work, since I only live six miles away from my place of employment. But I don't have viable bike route.

(If I worked downtown I would though, since there's an excellent bike path along a railroad track that lead's to downtown Minneapolis about a half mile from the apartment complex I live in.)

Update 7:

Bob - It's nice to know you like the idea of encouragement over taxation.

Update 8:

BB - I fully understand what your saying, since I feel the same way. But what I'm learning from some of these answers are some great ideas for possible government regulations. So if they look more at implementing some new regulations that they feel could help our environment I wouldn't object to that.

Like automobile manufacturers needing to build more fuel efficient vehicles.

or

Better regulations to make apartment compex replace appliances for more energy efficient appliances.

Update 9:

Don - I ask you to really think about what you are suggesting. If we restrict both the amount of oil we pump out of our oil wells and the amount we import that will cause gas prices to increase even more. That will also cause essential items - Food and Clothing - prices to increase.

Update 10:

You all are giving such good answers that I'm going to have a very hard time choosing a best answer. I wish I could award more than one answerer best answer for this question, but since I can't I want you all to know that all your answers were great and I feel the answer community will learn a lot from reading these answers.

15 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Increase rebates on alternative energy.

    remove speed restrictions on Electric vehicles.

    build bike lanes along major highways.

    mandate alternative energy on all government buildings.

    Replace all government vehicles with alternative fuel vehicles.

    stop selling carbon credit to over polluting companies, and make them comply with the EPA mandates.

    Source(s): jcms
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    What the oil companies that are sponsoring this scam do not want. Build every new power plant nuclear and replace every coal, gas or oil powered plant that can not meet emissions standards with nuclear. Then start building solar power stations in orbit for the long term. Burning oil or coal as fuel is as dumb as burning food for fuel.

  • 1 decade ago

    The most obvious first step is to restrict the amount of fossil fuel that can be imported or extracted. If it is imported or extracted it will be burned.

    We can not be sure that reducing burning of fossil fuels alone will stop global warming, helpful as this would be. We also have to do something to increase the uptake of CO2 by terrestrial plants, which means make sure those plants, particularly trees, have enough water to do that job. This means that we need to provide structures to contain flood water and distribute it to our lands, including forest lands. We also need to reclaim all our waste water for forest irrigation.

    We have megatons of ocean plant material sinking into the oceans and causing death of animal life as it decomposes. We can make our oceans healthier if we harvest that plant matter to be used as bio-fuel... This can and should be done by private enterprise, but because we are involved in international water we should consult with other nations on sharing agreements.

    The need for cap and trade is largely eliminated if we restrict extraction and importation of fossil fuels, but cap, without trade option, may be needed to ensure we can still feed ourselves. If we can use someone else's share of the fossil fuel, we may be using the fuel someone else needs to produce or transport the very food we need. Wealth alone may not allow us to determine who is allowed to waste our fossil fuels.

  • 1 decade ago

    Ban new fossil fuel power plants.

    Then we'll let the market decide what to replace fossil fuels with (though we'll probably find it's nuclear power).

    I'd also remove all renewable energy subsidies (since they wouldn't be needed for CO2 reasons without having to face competition from new fossil fuels).

    A carbon tax would also be nice although a ban on new fossil fuelled electricity with phase out dates of existing power plants would be better. Cap and trade should be avoided if possible.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Nothing. Government will use the alleged global warming craze as a taxing opportunity. When the government claims that subsidies/funding for alternative fuels (or anything else for that matter) will not increase our tax bill but will be 'financed' by windfall profits taxes on .... in this case ..... oil companies, they (government) hopes that the masses will fall for it. When taxes and other expenses go up for any business.... we (the taxpayers) pay more for products/services when those expenses go up.

    Keep the government out of the business of climate. If there is ever proof of 'man-did-it' global warming, the private sector will take care of it. Remember the government's last effort to 'fix' pollution ... ethanol??!! That boondoggle is costing us $$Billions and pollutes more than regular gasoline!!

  • 1 decade ago

    Everyone in the United States should be fined if he/she throws out too much trash or doesn't recycle. The measures should be tighter and stricter to save this planet. Other countries already serve less food in the restaurants to waste little. US is pouring food to every customer when they don't need that much. Government should provide more public transportation and let the ones that drive a car should pay more tax. That way streets will clear up and produce less air pollution. There should be a limit to one car per person or per family. All others should be fined.

  • 1 decade ago

    There is incredible opportunity for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. What we need is leadership on this issue, and no, it can not wait until 2050. We need to stop subsidizing the oil, coal, and gas industries. These guys are having record profits anyhow. Let us use that money to wean ourselves from fossil fuels. With American momentum, we can solve almost any problem. The Manhattan Project: completed within years. A man on the moon before the decade (1960's) is out: done. Jimmy Carter's goal for energy independence within 20 years: ummm, still need to work on that—Reagan cut those goals and ripped the solar panels from the roof of the White House to prove a point that policy had changed.

    Opportunities for improvement could included, but not limited to:

    Renewable energy obligations; switch electric production from coal based to nuclear power, renewable heat and power (hydropower, solar, wind, geothermal and bioenergy).

    Eliminate fossil fuel subsidies.

    Taxes or carbon charges on fossil fuels

    Invest in new renewable energy technology.

    Encourage more fuel efficient vehicles; hybrid vehicles; cleaner diesel vehicles.

    Additional biofuel blending and CO2 standards for road transport.

    Encourage a shift from road transport to rail and public transport systems; Investment in attractive public transport facilities and non-motorized forms of transportation.

    Upgrade building codes and standards; encourage efficient lighting and day lighting; improved insulation; passive and active solar design for heating and cooling.

    Encourage more efficient electrical appliances and heating and cooling devices; improved cook stoves.

    Encourage alternative refrigeration fluids; mandate the recovery and recycle of fluorinated gases.

    Improved crop and grazing land management to increase soil carbon storage.

    Improved rice cultivation techniques and livestock and manure management to reduce CH4 emissions.

    Improved nitrogen fertilizer application techniques to reduce N2O emissions.

    Restoration degraded lands; reforestation; forest management; reduced deforestation.

    Better harvested wood product management; use of forestry products for bioenergy to replace fossil fuel use.

    Landfill methane recovery; waste incineration with energy recovery; composting of organic waste; controlled waste water treatment; recycling and waste minimization.

  • 1 decade ago

    Not a damn thing.

    We already have enough government intrusion in our lives and I don't want a nanny state restricting my 'emissions' nor taxing me for it.

    There is a certain emission I'd like to release in the presence of our government and it ain't sweet, brother.

  • Bob
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    For starters, encourage alternative energy development, and conservation with things like tax credits.. Fund research into alternative energy development. Pass new gas mileage standards for cars/trucks.

    Given the current price of oil, those things are basically no brainers.

    The American people agree:

    "A vast majority of Americans, across all political parties, overwhelmingly support development and funding of solar energy. Ninety-one percent of Republicans, 97 percent of Democrats and 98 percent of Independents agree that developing solar power is vital to the United States."

    http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS13...

    But the Republicans have blocked the bill supporting this. They won't even let it be debated:

    "For the fourth time this summer Republicans have stopped the Senate from taking up wide-ranging legislation that provides tax credits to an array of renewable-energy entrepreneurs..."

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/200...

  • 1 decade ago

    I think the government should do absolutely nothing but protect the borders, provide a national currency, and arbitrate between the states (but unfortunately, that's just me).

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.