Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Are "if...then" constructs always really syllogisms?

Example:

"If I have no money I can't buy groceries."

Syllogistic form:

Premise: I have no money.

Conclusion: I can't buy groceries.

Silent premise: Buying groceries requires money.

Question: Can you think of an "if...then" construct that is not really a syllogism?

P.S.: Use English only -- no mathematical notation.

Update:

Just no Silent Premise, Jimmy W. Thanks in advance...

Update 2:

The silent premise in that, Jimmy W, is that rolling will (or may) put out such a fire.

I was thinking the silent premise might be precisely what an "if...then" construct seeks to communicate. But in your last example, because of the "not", it seems the message is something else: namely, that you will only drop, stop and roll when you're on fire (not for other reasons, or without a reason).

2 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    You want a "if ... then " construct like the above one about money. However, you don't want it to have a Premise, Conclusion, or Silent Premise.

    Hmmm...

    "If I discover a construct that is not a syllogism

    I will let you know."

    EDIT: What about:

    "If I am on not on fire,

    I will not stop, drop and roll."

    You can be on fire without rolling. And you can roll without being on fire. The 2 are not necessarily connected. So there is no silent premise. Right?

    EDIT: Okay; So you want a construct where the 2 things are apparently not related.

    "If I have no milk, then I will eat Chilli for breakfast."

    The silent premise is unapparent ; milk and chilli are 2 completely unrelated variables, yet in my case the one relies on the other for no apparent reason. ... Right?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    cant wont.. ..so NO!!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.