Should we keep Affirmative Action around just in case?

AA is meant for those who don't come from a strong financial background as well as those who have to deal with inherent disadvantages within the system, even if Whites are a minority, they'll probably, as a whole, still be better off than most other groups except Asians if education within the U.S. isn't radically augmented

I co-sign with Notorious. The thing that gets me is that people hear Affirm. Action and automatically think African-Americans. AA was put in place to help people of all races with a disadvantage. It could mean single parents or products of single unit homes, disabled or handicapped persons, orphans, etc. If everyone can one day be presented with the same opportunities, then the need for AA will be no more.

Affirmative Action isn't just about race or gender. It also helps disabled Americans. Getting rid of it now would put them back in the same situation they were in before.

I still am a firm believer in merit-based hiring, even if I am part of a minority in x decades.

Affirmative Actions should of never existed to begin with. Completely unnecessary and ended up screwing over a lot of more qualified applicants.

i think of your Democrat acquaintances are racist, as you comprehend that knife cuts each and every tactics. Democrats are in any respect circumstances labeling the companies they are finding to attraction to...those are the blacks, those are the latinos, those are the jewish, those are the...Fill interior the sparkling. they are those that consistently see shade and lable it, conservatives by potential of and huge are extra tolerant of all and define companies now no longer via shade, race or gender, although if by potential of potential of the user-friendly interest they have interior the couse. The Republicans have infrequently ever offered votes by potential of potential of promising entitlements or courses that save individuals enslaved to the technique, Democrats do so on a prevalent foundation. go searching you/we are able to be conscious only how enslaved the undesirable are by potential of potential of entitlement purposes. it rather is by no potential specific to apply everybody, it rather is barely proper to enable people volunteer and paintings for a purpose, no longer be used. Progressives/Liberals do tend to make the main of folk as they climb to the positions they desire to attain. lifestyles is physically powerful, all existence, conservative oftentimes think of this fact. modern-day/Liberal on the finished evaluate that it is an perfect option to kill unborn lifestyles. Conservatives normally desire to have much less governmental intrusion on their lives and to be taxed rather and to no longer pay for entitlement courses which would be for people who do no longer intend to be efficient for society. i'm going to be waiting to pass on although if curiously which you on the finished tend in the direction of a extra enlightened, conservative political place. As for the Republican party, many evaluate the party supported a candidate (John McCain) that became neither a conservative nor representative of our morals or viewpoints. The party needs to reinvent itself or it's going to see a floor swell of conservatives watching for applicants that authentic meet the objectives and ideology of conservatives and now no longer helping it is "democrat look alike" applicants. look for a stunning conservative, constitutionalist candidate to vote for they're going to fulfill your ideals and tournament you politically. stunning fulfillment.

That should have been dropped long ago. Caused more problems than it solved. Should be employed by merit/experience, nothing else.

Nope, since the HISTORICAL election of Obama is proof that we have finally achieved racial equality, that clause should be taken out it.

Yes.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Hell no. It hasn't done a damn bit of good.