Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

First lady Michelle Obama is not pleased about the marketing of ?

The TY versions of her children.

She apparently hasn't 'gotten the idea' that she is no longer a private anything anymore and neither is any of her family members.

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    As I've said on here before, "If they can't stand the heat, they should have stayed out of the kitchen"

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Are you a right-wing troll?

    Until the Carter administration, the press tended to leave the kids alone. Then right-wing press started stalking Amy Carter.

    Funny, they laid off on Bush 1's kids -- even though Dubya was busted many times for drunk driving in college - and arrested for cocaine possession; the records apparently "disappeared," which is not surprising when Daddy used to run the CIA. Dubya's little twins had a habit of appearing drunk in public, but if you read American media you never heard about that.

    And the attack dogs are out because - gasp! - THE PRESIDENT IS BLACK.

    Get over it. And stop picking on his kids.

  • Such hypocrisy! When it was Sarah Palin's EIGHTEEN year old daughter, the Republicans all screamed if anyone said a word about Bristol's pregnancy. But since winning the election, you've declared open season on President Obama's 7 & 10 year old daughters who are in the spotlight but unlike Bristol they did not bring that upon themselves. Does, "Leave the kids alone" only apply to Palin's daughter? Mrs. Obama is making a wise choice. Good for her!

    Perfect example! Palin's still whining about it. And the "kid" she's whining about is an ADULT!

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/ap_on_re_us/pa...

  • wdx2bb
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Children haven't been "public figures" while in the White House. See Chelsea Clinton for details. I'd be upset too. Wouldn't you?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • neet
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    She and her husband are in politics, not Sasha and Malia!

    Tumornecrosis is right, you guys are a hypocrites. When everyone was talking about Bristol's pregnancy (which was very relevant considering she was pandering abstinence as the only acceptable form of sex ed) y'all were going crazy.

    But hey, you are the party of hypocrites and contradictions so i shouldn't expect any less.

  • Mac
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    She just doesn't like how they are using her kids to make money. I can understand that but what is she going to do. There are pros and cons in having your husband be the president.

  • 1 decade ago

    Her girls are so cute, so therefore they are gonna pursue them in all areas. They should pay them to be the models for the JCrew Catalog. Since the business skyrocketed after the inauguration.

  • 1 decade ago

    if they wanted a normal life for the kids they wouldnt be big shots like they are,

    most kids dont go all over the place in jets and helicopters and live in the white house and have parents who went to harvard and all that elite crap. i support obama but this talk about wanting a normal life for the kids is a bunch of public relations BS

  • 1 decade ago

    What she really hasn't come to grips with is that she can't control everything in her life...although watch a while she'll try just like Hilary did as first lady.

  • mtnglo
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Her children should be off limits. They are so young, and Michelle wants them to live as normal a life as they can. What a wonderful mother she is!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.