Is this the "transitional species" you were asking about?

no the one I was talking about were the other millions

There have been several fossils mistaken as being "transitional fossils" yet none of them have been truly credible. I would have to wait for further research before calling it a transitional fossil.

The link doesn't work but I know what you're referencing to.

Your link doesn't work.

Now we're talking, intelligent design by the goddess. Lose the tail and stand up, make up a bogus religion and get them all marching in a line.

We hate to think we evolved from monkeys or chimps, I prefer to think we evolved from cute little lemurs and rascally polecats.

There is no such thing as a "transitional species" or "transitional fossil" because -ALL- animals, species, fossils, etc, are transitional.

Every single living thing is a transitional species between their parents and their offspring.

I saw it too. The missing link. The Creationists are to deluded to see it though.

If you are trying to disprove evolution by a link that doesn't work you are doing a fine job of showing that you are clueless.

It's "transitional fossil" and all fossils are transitional.

btw,you didn't post the link right.

link fail. it doesn't matter, there are numerous transitional species. This is just one example:

http://www.trilobita.de/gallery/others/archaeopter...

oh look! I can copy and paste!

You didn't type in the whole URL