When a dog gets hold of your arm or gently chews it means it's showing you love & affection?

As a few others have already mentioned, the word "dominance" gets a lot of use in here when in fact, it has nothing to do with most pet dog behavior.

Chewing can be attributed to many things and some of those have been mentioned in here as well.

It CAN be a sign of dominance in a very, very few dogs, but, chewing would not be the only behavior these dogs exhibited.

I have a shepherd who loved to put my arm in his mouth and just hold it there..it was not dominance, it was annoying though and we stopped it. He tried it with a few others and I stopped it there too, but, it was still not dominance.

Dominance has been discussed here somewhat extensively by a few people, myself included, recently and there were some decent answers. One has to be really good at being able to read dogs and the breed to be able to tell if that is really what is going on or not.

Again, in order to be real dominance there would have to be a host of other behaviors as well that support that theory.

I do not allow it ever because most of my dogs have very dominant tendencies and it could really boil over and create more problems that I do not need. Hope I helped!

I have/had pretty affectionate dogs... none have ever grabbed me by the arm, I wouldn't consider any one or anything grabbing me by the arm a sign of affection. Dogs are not very good at showing affection, what we as humans would consider affection, there is always a hidden agender behind it with dogs, whether it be attention, food, a walk, up on the couch... ect people seem to think dogs are just as straight forward as humans... but they're not. There emotions are pretty complicated and are NOT self explanatory like ours.

LEGIT: No because I rather walk him every where I can, we *still* socializing and can meet far more dogs and people while walking than in a car and he is very accustom to being in the car so it doesn't really play a big part.

EDIT: thats a shame, I've been to Indonesia many times and if its anything like that, its just awful, so heartbreaking. But at least there is a place you can go. The dogothon sounds fun though, we have a million paws walk for dogs (another one for cats) which is great fun, and tires puppy out, which makes for a peaceful home lol.

Fingers crossed for Amber :)

In some of your examples, yes, it's dominant behavior, in others, no it isn't.

Do grabbing, mouthing: Not Dominance. Annoying, attention-seeking behavior? Absolutely. More typical in Retrieving breeds if you haven't trained them out of it and supplied them with appropriate objects to carry? Sometimes.

Sitting on laps: Depends on the dog. Sometimes it could be a dominant behavior, if the dog is challenging you for your spot on the couch. But lots of other times the dog has been taught that this is allowed. If he gets down off your lap if you tell him to, I wouldn't worry about it being a dominance move, because the owner clearly controls the resource (the couch). If the dog won't allow anyone else to approach, that's aggression and anxiety, not dominance so much. A dominant dog would be able to keep other away without all those displays and aggression. Dominant dogs KNOW they have preferred access, rather than constantly bucking to get preferred access. Wanna-bes bark and bite and are otherwise unreliable.

Leaning on you: There are a lot of breeds that are champion leaners--it's how they sit with you. Nothing challenging about it. I'd be a lot more worried about a dog that has to pass by you several times, rubbing itself all over you--they mark objects the same way, and several of those dogs are bound for aggression problems (not dominance problems) if you believe Sue Sternberg.

Pawing and barking at you: Again, depends on the situation. Often plain old bad manners and attention seeking that can be trained out. Also sometimes poor frustration tolerance.

The Weimeraner owner has an aggressive dog, not a dominant one. And an idiot for an owner! Yes, she was absolutely encouraging that behavior. (Glad you were OK!)

You sound like someone who has trained her dogs to be well--behaved, although I think you may have some misunderstanding between the definitions of dominance and aggression in the strict behavioral sense. But with the way you are training your dogs, it doesn't matter because you are unlikely to have issues.

Legit: A few times a week. She loves the car! The park, to visit friends, or for any short trip where I won't have to leave her in the car.

Sorry, this is going to be a short reply, last message before I go out...

I have a couple that do that.

One of my old danes used to hold onto your wrist when we went for walks.

Every time.

She would just hold on very gently, like she was leading me around.

That may have been a dominance issue.

However....

I have a male poodle that grabs hold of my wrist the same way but he moves his tongue back and forth like he is trying to lick me but with my hand in his mouth...

That seems more like affection than dominance.

Now Danes trying to sit on your lap, that's a whole 'nother story...

again, sorry for the short reply...

I don't think it's an expression of dominance. Dogs are programmed to play out their hierarchies among each other, and I've yet to see a dominant (or any) dog that sits on another's lap. If your dog felt it was dominant, it would continue attacking you until you showed an accepted sign of submission. It wouldn't waste time slobbering on your arm or sitting on your lap.

The question of whether dogs should be trained to not attack _other_ people is another one. Yes, the guy who praises his dog after it attacks other people is either ignorant or lazy. But again, there is no evidence that the dog views this owner as an inferior. If it did, it would attack him as well, and it certainly wouldn't care whether he approved of its behaviour or not.

Lastly, I see why people's eyes tend to glaze over when you tell them about your dominance theory. It makes about as much sense as psychoanalysis to me. That is, no matter what the evidence, you've already made up your mind about the cause and structure, and will interpret all evidence in a way that fits your theory.

"The instinct to bite also means that these dogs are very oral, that is they use their mouths constantly. They "taste test" nearly everything and they love to chew. Many will try to gently chew on people as a sign of affection. Most will chew anything in sight if this is not directed toward acceptable chew toys. Directing your ACD puppy's "mouthiness" is an important part of his socialization and training."

From ACD facts by Mark Abbott.

Not that this is proper behavior, but it is rather normal in this breed. My ACD did this when I first got her, and we worked to get her to mouth with no teeth. This is not a "kissy" breed. It has absolutely nothing to do with dominance, it is all about what the ACD was bred to do. You can't train out a breed trait (and why would you want to), but you can teach control.

Miniature Pinschers have been turned into "lap" dogs over the years in this country because they are not needed as vermin hunters here. I allow my Pins to sit on my lap, but they are not allowed to show aggression to other Pins because of it. The "lap" behavior is a social behavior in a Pin pack, and they often bunch up amongst themselves as well.

I think the Greyhound owners would disagreee about "leaning" being a dominance issue. It is common for a Greyhound to lean on its owner, and does no harm at all. It is a social behavior.

I do think there are quite a few uninformed dog owners in the world, who tolerate or encourage bad behaviors in their dogs, but I also think you can't just generalize all the breeds and blame it on dominance.

That is a load of bull, and sounds very Cesar Millan.

Legit: My ACD loves car rides and walking in the woods. We try to go out as much as we can. My other dogs could care less.

You are correct. Chewing on you or your clothing, placing a paw over your leg or arm, lying on your feet and bumping into you are ways for a dog to show dominance.

Idiotic dog owners are why good breeds have a bad rap, whether it's an American Pit Bull Terrier or a Chihuahua.

I get your point, but Jesse is correct. If you think all of the behaviors that you described, by all dogs, are merely the dog dominating..then you will be miserable all of your life, with most of the dogs that you witness..

That word, "Dominance" is WAY overused by most people..

80% of the time when a person states their dog is dominant, it means that the dog is seeking a leader.

Dogs WANT to be trained and guided.

Re:Car rides.

They get to go often when the weather is nice.

About the only time any of my dogs have done that is when we are playing. The only exceptions were a couple of times they wanted me to go somewhere to investigate a noise or open a door for them.

Most of the dogs I have had would protect me, and they were smart enough to know if and when it was needed.

Yeah I agree with you.

My dog does not bite or chew me, but he does my younger brother, he is always showing his dominance over my brother, and trying to prove his importance in my life over my brother.

This behavior can also have the dog put down, he chews another person that person may submit a complaint to have the dog put down. Even of the dog didn't mean to or didn't hurt the person. Encouraging this behavior is not good.

I take my dog to off leash dog parks, beaches, with people and isolate to let him run off leash, parks, fenced in sporting grounds, walking and riding routes, around the block. If my mum isn't busy we usually go to these places for lunch or dinner on a sunday.

If you need playmates for your dogs ive seen people advertise play dates on local notice boards.